Can we also take Gemini and Co-pilot too?How about killing the entire company off for the same reason?
*industryHow about killing the entire company off for the same reason?
They are willing to give people bullet wounds, but not boners? That red line is awfully flexible and not very line-shaped.
ChatGPT been proven plenty of times to be the exact opposite and they're only now questioning OpenAI's plans?Staff began questioning whether sexy ChatGPT aligned with OpenAI’s mission to make AI that benefits humanity.
Some staff reportedly questioned how sexy ChatGPT benefits humanity.
It is technically and literally true that it is following backlash, but don't make the mistake of reading that it is because of backlash.Following backlash, OpenAI won’t be rolling out an erotic version of ChatGPT any time soon.
According to the Financial Times, the controversial plan has been shelved “indefinitely” as OpenAI “refocuses” its attention on “core products.”
It's really scary how accurate this was.
With the potential liability they've already flagged, and now with social media companies being held liable, the revenue wasn't going to be worth it.This has nothing to do with benefitting humanity and everything with realising that consumer AI isn’t a viable business case.
Not American. But fictional (text) descriptions of incest and bestiality fall within the first amendment protections or no? I'm not clear on this, but the "illegal "behavior"" comment seemed like an overstatement.It was also hard to keep illegal behavior out of outputs, like bestiality and incest, when using datasets that included sexual content, sources said.
Possibly, but it's a market that's probably best left to a small company running in a remote country that can more easily avoid lawsuits.Isn't ai girlfriends and such still growing?
Some even come with creepy holograms and such...
As much as I am glad to see a reduction in slop, I am surprised to hear they will be letting others make money in that field.
What reputation?as some investors questioned why OpenAI would risk its reputation
On YouTube you can eventually train it not to show stuff like that if you just persist in flagging all such content as something you don't like. It must have taken me a couple of years, but these days YouTube pretty consistently only displays stuff related to my interest.I sign in to Youtube or major news websites and see gifs of missile and drone strikes. Without any choice. Just murder immediately.
So close…Some staff reportedly questioned how sexy ChatGPT benefits humanity.
I need to watch the news. I feel like it's important to act as a witness to what is happening. Especially the things that are done in my name.On YouTube you can eventually train it not to show stuff like that if you just persist in flagging all such content as something you don't like. It must have taken me a couple of years, but these days YouTube pretty consistently only displays stuff related to my interest.
As for major news sites...well, I decided already over a decade ago that those just aren't good for my mental health and made the conscious decision to just not read or watch general news at all. One of the best decisions in my life.
Depictions of those generally fall into the obscenity exclusion and can be legislated.Not American. But fictional (text) descriptions of incest and bestiality fall within the first amendment protections or no? I'm not clear on this, but the "illegal "behavior"" comment seemed like an overstatement.
It is technically and literally true that it is following backlash, but don't make the mistake of reading that it is because of backlash.
It's because the company is financially--pardon the on-topic euphemism--boned.
Online porn seems to be one of the few areas online where you can actually get people to pay real money (albeit with a higher chargeback rate than other content verticals). For a company that's as morally bankrupt and hemorrhaging cash faster than a blast furnace could burn it all, you'd think this is an area OpenAI could actually find some possibility of profit.
I guess Americans are still more afraid of nipples than bullets.
See also: consumer VCRs, what if porn studios had used Betamax?
The kinds of people that need online adult AI 'companions' are not usually cash rich.While people will pay money for GenAI porn, they won't pay enough money to cover the costs of OpenAI to develop and produce those AI models. GenAI porn companies tend to be, like most porn companies, run on a shoestring budget. They don't attract the best programmers because they can't afford to pay them that much.
It's not about the bad press; it's all about the bottom line.
You think those sites don't exist already? Sites, plural.you know someone somewhere is already creating GoonerGPT even if Altman won't, for now.