I'm guessing Dr. Mole was consulted for this article.“a wee problem like this seems like a big win”
Best space journalist there is good sir
If the toilet breaks on the way to Mars, there is a non-zero chance the crew is dying.
Is it worse to have just one toilet or just one coffee machine?Maybe they should have more than one toilet for the trip to Mars...
Yes.Is it worse to have just one toilet or just one coffee machine?
If my parents were flying, though, you bet your ass they would. "We just stopped three days ago and you have to go again? We aren't stopping! Figure it out."At least they aren’t having to pee in bottles … yet.
Go ahead and try it: The resulting gastro issues are (to be careful in phrasing) Challenging.I don't understand why some efficiency expert hasn't combined both appliances. Just be careful with the plumbing.
On a more serious note... why not put astronauts on a low residue (no poop) diet? 10 days isn't that long.
They did, but they could only produce something not entirely dissimilar to Dutch lager. Still, at least the solid waste is good for fattening up space weevils.I don't understand why some efficiency expert hasn't combined both appliances. Just be careful with the plumbing.
But I've been assured that the Moon is not a useful stepping stone to Mars!One can get away with “roughing it” when using the bathroom during trips to the Moon. Going to Mars, requiring months in space, is a different matter. If the toilet breaks on the way to Mars, there is a non-zero chance the crew is dying. So it’s great to try out these systems now, on Orion. This really is the purpose of this test flight, to make sure life support systems work for the crew, to identify problems, and to implement fixes in the future.
That's just it. It's not a shakedown cruise, they went full fat around the moon. They're doing LEO testing after this, so lets hope a frozen toilet is the biggest thing on this test flight.Things like this are exactly what a shakedown cruise is all about. Identify problem areas and let the engineers get them fixed for the next flight.
I vaguely recall a similar problem on perhaps a Gemini or Apollo mission, and a photo of a yellow tinted icicle sticking out from the dump tube on the side of the capsule.
ya if nasa wasn't so strapped for funding they would have launched a full duration mission around the earth like we did with apollo 9That's just it. It's not a shakedown cruise, they went full fat around the moon. They're doing LEO testing after this, so lets hope a frozen toilet is the biggest thing on this test flight.
IIRC, there were toilet-related problems on STS with frozen urine dumps attached to the outside of the vehicle.Things like this are exactly what a shakedown cruise is all about. Identify problem areas and let the engineers get them fixed for the next flight.
I vaguely recall a similar problem on perhaps a Gemini or Apollo mission, and a photo of a yellow tinted icicle sticking out from the dump tube on the side of the capsule.
That's Artemis 3. Artemis 2 is Apollo 7 and 8, 3 is 9, and I guess 4 will be 10 and 11, in theory.ya if nasa wasn't so strapped for funding they would have launched a full duration mission around the earth like we did with apollo 9
The term "shakedown cruise" doesn't necessarily mean that operations are limited in scope or duration. It's a nautical term, but it fits the Artemis 2 mission quite well.That's just it. It's not a shakedown cruise, they went full fat around the moon. They're doing LEO testing after this, so lets hope a frozen toilet is the biggest thing on this test flight.
It’s not that NASA didn’t spend enough, it’s that they let their contractors under deliver. If the contractors had spent less time and money on “development” some of those unused resources could have been spent on said additional (safer) testing in Earth orbit.ya if nasa wasn't so strapped for funding they would have launched a full duration mission around the earth like we did with apollo 9
Have they consulted with Australia? They know how to take the piss out of anything.
Well, if that’s the worst problem on a mission of this duration and scale, I’d say…urine luck.
Yes, I recently heard about for the navy that you need three ships to have one operational at all times, (one spare and one being worked on in addition to the one in use), so doing something similar with toilets would be prudent.Maybe they should have more than one toilet for the trip to Mars...