Apple abruptly yanks privacy tool in UK, taking bold stance against snooping law.
See full article...
See full article...
I suspect because Apple didn't want to waste money on performatively trying to create the impossible, i.e. an encryption scheme that's only able to be decrypted by the user or the "good guys" (agents of the state). Our security services seem to spend an inordinate amount of time poring through every section of public life, hoovering up large amounts of tax money, and preventing precisely fuck all(*) of note, although they do spend significant expense on domestic left-wing protest and enabling the police to pre-emptively detain people before such a protest. The entire thing needs reform, including the police, as there's too much deference to the landed class and not enough to the security of the country, not that this will happen in my lifetime.I don't understand how turning off end to end encryption is a better solution. Now the UK can get the data they wanted (along with a lot of other folks), plus it's a signal to other countries they can just pressure Apple to turn off encryption in their countries too.
Ok, I’ll bite. What did you want them to do instead?Yeah, except now everyone knows that if you pressure Apple, they will shut down their E2E Encryption for you, too.
Seems like a great time for someone knowledgeable about the subject to write a how-to article about personal on prem NAS's and rolling your own encrypted backup. Seems like some Brit's could make use of such instructions.
The cons are the ones who have really been instrumental in pushing this idea though, let’s be fairAs a UK resident I fully support Apple here. More incompetence from the Labour government (and I speak as a Labour voter).
Uh, it's not just Apple saying this. It's every computer security person on the planet, and those that implement end-to-end encryption for data security. That would be every bank, as well.According to Apple, complying with the UK law could have enabled not just government officials but also bad actors to gain access to encrypted data.
It’s what you used to have before apple enabled end-to-end encryption. The Uk government wanted people to believe they had end-to-end encryption but be lied to. So now you know the truth.Maybe I am missing something but doesnt this give the UK exactly what it asked for namely unencrypted access?
It doesnt seem good to me.
I'll bet the odds at Lloyd's are in favor of the pullout and not the capitulation ratio.I presume UK government will still complain that law is not followed because "what about all the other users" part. So the real question will be, would Apple decide to abandon whole UK market if (or perhaps when) this happens
What happens when I travel to the UK?
Are my backups encrypted?
Don't worry, Kemi Badenoch (opposition Conservative party leader) "is an engineer" (she studied Computer Systems Engineering and worked in IT for a few years). Last heard wittering something about pronouns, clearly applying engineering to the great matters of state...It basically comes from none of our MPs understanding how encryption works, and that it's not possible to backdoor maths for the purposes of "national security". We need more technically minded people in politics, although that's hardly likely to happen.
i recall reading about him when he first won. it was pretty clear (to me) that he wasn’t the hero britain needed. i wondered: how did it happen that this specific guy won? labor needed a win for conservatives to avoid being tarred and feathered (imo) and im sure they knew it. my guesses aren’t happy ones.Labor under Keir Starmer has been a thorough disappointment. After the shit-show of the former Conservative goverment(s), there were hopes that Starmer would right the ship. Instead he has cozied up to Trump like no other in Europe except Orban, suspended MPs opposing the two child benefit cap(which will increase child poverty), hypocritically accepted gifts from party donors(including expensive clothes for his wife), etc. The demand to disable encryption is the opposite of what I'd expect from a former human rights lawyer.
the question becomes, does this apply to everyone who enters uk? and how many visitors will not turn up because of this?
do certain (foreign/international) businesses have it on mandatorily for their work phones and decide they'll simple pull the plug on doing business here?
Fight the law until they've exhausted every other avenue.Ok, I’ll bite. What did you want them to do instead?
"Rather than break the security promises it made to its users everywhere, Apple is likely to stop offering encrypted storage in the UK," The Washington Post paraphrased its sources as saying. "Yet that concession would not fulfill the UK demand for backdoor access to the service in other countries, including the United States."
Don't worry, Kemi Badenoch (opposition Conservative party leader) "is an engineer" (she studied Computer Systems Engineering and worked in IT for a few years). Last heard wittering something about pronouns, clearly applying engineering to the great matters of state...
That's not what E2EE means, you can't just argue 'oh well it's E2E if we redefine the end'. iCloud without ADP isn't E2EE (with exceptions for health and keychain), as Apple will happily tell you.iCloud is still end-to-end encrypted, it's just a question of where the "end" is. Without ADP, iCloud data is encrypted but Apple has the key. This is useful for people who aren't good at managing their own keys and want Apple to restore their data when they lose the keys. When you enable ADP, you're telling Apple you want to manage your own keys and you don't want them to keep a copy.
While I agree with the sentiment, said persons had better be extremely knowledgeable and competent, because roll-your-own security and encryption is rarely reliably secure (if ever)Seems like a great time for someone knowledgeable about the subject to write a how-to article about personal on prem NAS's and rolling your own encrypted backup. Seems like some Brit's could make use of such instructions.
Apple is not at all consistent on this issue. While iMessages is E2E encrypted in China, icloud data isn't because the data has to be stored in Chinese data centers with encryption keys accessible to the government.Agree that installing a ‘backdoor’ would be inviting disaster. I’m sure that this fact has been explained to the Powers That Be in the UK over and over again. One can only hope that governmental authorities elsewhere understand this better.
Most likely the same sort of thing that determines EU user for DMA purposes - it's a bunch of stuff related to physical location but also iTunes account billingI have similar questions. What determines a UK user? The phone service/ number? Point of sale?
It can't be geographic location, can it? If so, what length of time determines it?
I'd guess the phone service provider.
We definitely don't want Hayden Christiansen or Keanu Reeves getting access to our data...could have enabled not just government officials but also bad actors to gain access to encrypted data
At least so far iMessage is E2EE in the UK too, so long as you turn off iCloud backups entirely.Apple is not at all consistent on this issue. While iMessages is E2E encrypted in China, icloud data isn't because the data has to be stored in Chinese data centers with encryption keys accessible to the government.
The only reason for Apple to turn off icloud encryption in the UK is because they anticipate an outcry and a change in the UK law while in China they know that it would be futile to fight the government. If China would require encryption keys for iMessage then surely Apple would comply given the size of that market.
No they didn't - your device would be the one doing the scanning. They were clearly attempting to come up with a solution that would discourage exactly this sort of heavy handed bullshit from governments by disarming their 'think of the children' arguments before they could make them.Apple may be much better than the vast majority of other tech companies when it comes to privacy, but let's not forget that this is the same company that scanned your iCloud photos in the name of finding CSAM. As usual, using "think of the children" to justify erosion of rights.
Well said. It shows an utter lack of understanding by those making this decision. This is totally misguided and now impacts all UK citizens. Depressing.Unbelievable stupidity from the UK government.
Hard to imagine a more convincing way to demonstrate your incompetence than this.
Google "3-2-1 backup strategy".Why would you use a cloud service to backup data that is important to you? Not exactly the most secure thing, storing your data on someone else's server, but it is very convenient.
Good. Hopefully the UK will reconsider as a result.
Labor under Keir Starmer has been a thorough disappointment. After the shit-show of the former Conservative goverment(s), there were hopes that Starmer would right the ship. Instead he has cozied up to Trump like no other in Europe except Orban, suspended MPs opposing the two child benefit cap(which will increase child poverty), hypocritically accepted gifts from party donors(including expensive clothes for his wife), etc. The demand to disable encryption is the opposite of what I'd expect from a former human rights lawyer.
One of the reasons I vote Lib Dem is that they are against that sort of thing. Both at the time, and now. In general, if Labour and Conservatives agree on a policy, and the Lib Dems are against it, the Lib Dems better reflect my position. Other examples include the Iraq war, the ID database, and Brexit.In fairness, the same nonsense has come from all the main parties about installing backdoors in things. They are all equally clueless on this stuff. This is just the first time that it's got this far.