Apple looking into slow iOS 4 performance on iPhone 3G

Status
Not open for further replies.
Woe unto the iPhone 3G user who has upgraded to iOS 4. There may be hope, though, as Apple has heard their cries and is reportedly investigating the issues.

<a href='http://meincmagazine.com/apple/news/2010/07/apple-looking-into-slow-ios-4-performance-on-iphone-3g.ars'>Read the whole story</a>
 

rotational

Ars Scholae Palatinae
884
I didn't realize downgrading was an option. I wish I had paid attention to the problems being reported before I upgraded - my 3G has been painful to use since. I'd consigned myself to just dealing with it until my contract was up in September and I switched to an Android phone, but if downgrading at home is doable, at least I won't have to be miserable until then.

Apple and AT&T have really laid some impressive turds lately...certainly not helping dissuade people who have been considering alternatives from switching.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

outlaw2005

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,425
Subscriptor
It certainly is a bone to pick with them. They claimed the OS would work on my phone, it runs like shit. That's like Microsoft setting the minimum requirements for Vista to a Pentium II 600mhz processor. My phone runs like crap since I've installed OS4. Unless Apple does something to really fix the problem, this will be my last iphone.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
mxl2101":3k50bjab said:
The iPhone 3G is two years old. Time to upgrade folks (or switch to android). There are plenty of bones to pick with Apple, but this is not one of them IMHO.

Just to put things into perspective, the venerable (and now retired) G1 is newer than the iPhone 3G.

Maybe Apple shouldn't have supported 3G with the new update then? Did Apple not perform any Quality checks? Going by all the hardware defects in Apple products lately, I am assuming not.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

issor

Ars Praefectus
5,625
Subscriptor
mxl2101":1buip3f8 said:
The iPhone 3G is two years old. Time to upgrade folks (or switch to android). There are plenty of bones to pick with Apple, but this is not one of them IMHO.

Just to put things into perspective, the venerable (and now retired) G1 is newer than the iPhone 3G.

Really? My phone, which worked fine (and is a company phone, btw), should be tossed aside and replaced because Apple made it slow and painful to use? I suppose any hardware manufacturer should 'update' your device with poor performance when they think it's time for you to upgrade?

My experience had been that the iphone 3G was already painfully slow at browsing, but everything else worked just fine. The interface and most other apps were snappy. Now even simple apps like contacts, text messaging, the system utilities, all freeze for 10-15 seconds occasionally when pressing a button or moving to the next 'screen'. Or sometimes the touch buttons just don't respond. Once I waited for 60 seconds for my contacts to show ( I have 24 contacts), and then just said screw it, locked the phone, and looked it up the old fashioned way... at my computer.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

Thraxen

Ars Scholae Palatinae
609
My wife complains about hers every day now. iOS4 completely trashed her phone. I understand why the 3G can't have things like multitasking, but I don't think it's unreasonable to expect to be able to use things like folders without an enormous hit in performance. Apple never should have allowed iOS4 to be deployed on 3G phones if this is the best they can do. It's like they didn't test jack shit with iOS4 or the iPhone 4, just left all the testing to their consumers.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

jrs65

Seniorius Lurkius
1
I don't care about about anything particularly fancy, but Mail and Messages have taken massive performance hits. Given the amount of new iOS4 features that are unavailable on the 3G, this step backwards in performance is a little unacceptable. I would upgrade, but I'm emigrating in a few months so there is little point.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

petwalrus

Seniorius Lurkius
34
Downgrading is not an option for the end user. It would require Apple to resume providing signing keys for 3.1.3 firmware.

For those who jailbroke their phones, there does exist a possibility that a copy of their signing keys are stored on a Cydia server which does allow them to downgrade.

I would say that there is 0% chance of Apple allowing users to return to 3.1.3 - as that would be like admitting they were wrong with the engineering of this update. (and we all know how good they are about *that*)

Perhaps iOS 4.1.0 will include some memory optimizations that could relieve the stresses on the 3G hardware.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
I have a jailbroken IPod Touch 2G. Installed 4.0 with multitasking and haven't noticed any performance issues. If anything, the change in the orientation (landscape to portrait) is much smoother. Applications launch much faster. Even Safari is faster. I do however make sure that I close all applications right away. Why would 3G have issues? Isn't it faster that 2G?
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
D

Deleted member 12245

Guest
imgod2u":em8w0g0e said:
Is it really surprising? Multitasking requires more RAM. It also requires something more powerful than an ARM11. It's not just 412MHz vs 600MHz. It's single-issue vs dual-issue, 4-entry history buffer vs 4096 entry history buffer, no BTB vs BTB, etc.

It's also not enabled on the 3G...
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

fitten

Ars Legatus Legionis
55,042
Subscriptor++
imgod2u":1cuq9i7y said:
Is it really surprising? Multitasking requires more RAM. It also requires something more powerful than an ARM11. It's not just 412MHz vs 600MHz. It's single-issue vs dual-issue, 4-entry history buffer vs 4096 entry history buffer, no BTB vs BTB, etc.

Actually, jailbroken iPhone (1st Gen) have been multitasking just fine for years. Jailbroken 3G do it fine as well. It's simply Apple that won't allow them to multitask using standard issue iOS4 on those devices. So, either those who write the jailbreak stuff are better at it than Apple is (which I don't doubt, honestly) and/or Apple is doing this completely for money reasons... to prod even harder those with 1st gen and 3G to upgrade and give Apple more money (and lessen the load of legacy support to cost Apple less money in addition).
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

d0gr0ck

Seniorius Lurkius
30
Subscriptor++
This appears to me to be a Vista type probelm (albiet much smaller scale and scope). Apple has released the "hot new" OS that performs best on the new hardware. However, not everyone is willing to make the new investment and installs it on the older hardware they've been told works. It works alright, with core functionality, but fails to meet expectations. Now the software maker catches the blame (rightly so in my mind) for having too lax minimum requirements.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

fitten

Ars Legatus Legionis
55,042
Subscriptor++
tenuki":3ff05fbc said:
I remember when ios4 came out, people were accusing Apple of nefariously limiting its features on the 3g to force upgrades.

^Ever used multitasking on a jailbroken 3g? It's just as bad as ios4 is now.

Nope, but it is *possible*. Apple just doesn't give you the option because they don't want users to have a 'bad experience'. They know better than you what features you want and what tradeoffs you're willing to make ;)
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
I've been having all sorts of problems on the G2 iPod touch. It's noticeably slower when launching apps, and the transitions between apps, or the unlock screen to home screen, often stutter. I wasn't expecting much as the major features weren't supported, but I didn't expect a downgrade in performance and experience. One friend has an iPhone 3G, and he has been experiencing similar problems. Another friend with a 3GS has also seen slowdowns, to a lesser extent.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
D

Deleted member 12245

Guest
d0gr0ck":1i1uljw7 said:
This appears to me to be a Vista type probelm (albiet much smaller scale and scope). Apple has released the "hot new" OS that performs best on the new hardware. However, not everyone is willing to make the new investment and installs it on the older hardware they've been told works. It works alright, with core functionality, but fails to meet expectations. Now the software maker catches the blame (rightly so in my mind) for having too lax minimum requirements.

Except this update doesn't really add much to a 3G, or as my SO put it after she decided to upgrade, "well, that was kind of pointless."
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
Status
Not open for further replies.