Search results

Ok I'm really done here.

.

I'm going by what NASA considers the boundaries of space. Does that not matter, given that SpaceX is being paid by government monies? And their moon program depends on them meeting deliverables?

The goal was to at least reach the edge of "space" and this launch was 26 miles short of that, no matter what the SpaceX bros and their downvotes say.

But it is still what they mainly work with.

Copyright is for the rich and powerful. Everyone else are bitter Luddites who are against "progress and open source".

The problem is, if this is the case, it's too little, too late. That train has left the station, as soon as ChatGPT came out, everyone else jumped on the bandwagon and AI is out in the wild now. OpenAI has the admittedly large benefit of Microsoft Money and huge compute but they are hardly the...

When I lost my insurance, this was the only affordable way to get my heart medications. It was not much different from going to a clinic, they took my history and I had to show them a photo of my previous (recent) prescriptions and talk to a doctor or nurse practitioner. Healthcare in the US is...

They absolutely should, they were up to their necks in this and FTX recently demanded they hand over that house in Bermuda and LOTS of money he handed off to them just before he was arrested. His father was on the payroll. This was a family grift.

It almost makes me humanize them and feel bad, like tricking a very clever but very naive child. I'm always nice to these chatbots, given the very slim chance they do become sentient one day, I don't want to be on their shit-list. "Remember when you lied to me about your dead grandmother, Dave?"

I'm afraid I don't understand the point to any of this? We are giving out scores to how bad the people we already know are bad, really are? Who does this help? How does this help? It just seems like a parlor game for the left. Because it will have zero effect on changing anyone's mind.

So it's not just me being paranoid. And yes I read all the possible explanations. And no, they didn't explain this occurring.

Oh so now we are in a stupid downvote battle with the ai bros, screw this noise, go pray to your new ai gods. Pathetic.

Pollock's work was not "random", it was made with intention and planning and human creativity. And you should really stop talking about a subject you are clearly ignorant about.

Of course I have and far more (Octavio Ocampo, Oleg Shupliak). And they are far more beautiful and interesting to look at. This doesn't impress me. /shrug

Artists have been creating optical illusion paintings for centuries.

Am I the only one not overly impressed by this? I mean it's a cool effect, optical illusion, but what is everyone so excited about? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills over here. If an artist actually painted them, yeah, sure but..

Yeah, I've read the previews were brutal. Then you know what happens, they go back and try to "fix" it, making it worse....

I followed the links back to the source (Bloomberg) and apparently it's one "credible threat" and they are working with the police. Writing it as "death threats" kind of makes it sound like some bs response to social media rage posting. I hate this as much as anyone but come the fuck on with...

You're saying that as if we are in some kind of denial about a serious threat. It's just the opposite. It's that it's hard to imagine even Musk doing something so stupid, that will wind up with him being humiliated in court (or more likely hit with a SLAPP suit before it even gets there).