Search results

It would be better to just totally destroy the tracker and get rid of the evidence. If they have no evidence, they have no case. They likely saw, from the GPS, that the tracker never left his house, which is why the found it. If you remove a GPS tracker, you need to destroy it, immediately...

If you are arrested for that , you just post bail then not show up in court and flee the country.

Also, you don't know who might have put it there. I have heard of drug mules not putting GPS trackers and cars, and hiding drugs in the cars of those not as likely to be selected for secondary inspection, crossing into the USA, then pick them up later, if they get through. While GPS jamming is...

In the 6 years I have lived here, there have been people that have used such jammers, and HomeRiver, who was run this place for the past five of those, has told me there is nothing they can do about it, as long as as they are not interfering with cellular voice calls. As far as HomeRiver is...

Some trackers might use a car power source, if the tracker you find does use a car power source, than pulling out the accessory fuse can be done, and would not be breaking any laws. This is likely why GPS based tolling has not yet been widely implemented. Someone could just pull out the fuse to...

Another way, if you find a tracking device on your car is to remove it and then smash it to pieces to destroy it and then throw the pieces in the river, to get rid of any evidence against you. They could still raid your house, but if the tracking device is nowhere to be found, they would have...

If the jammer jams data, and not voice, it is not illegal. It is only illegal to jam cellulular voice calls. Jamming wireless Internet is not illegal, and there are jammers that can jam data, but not voice,. I know this becuase in the 6 years I have lived in the apartement I have lived in, I...

True they could raid your house, but they would find the GPS device still attached to his car, but would never figure out why the device quit working. They would never figure out he was jamming it. They would just be stumped as to why the tracker was not working properly, when they found it...

However, he could not be charged with a crime if he used a jammer to prevent it from working. They would never suspect he was using a jammer

Another way he could have done it was to get a jammer that jams wireless Internet (1x,2g,3g,4g,5g,wifi,wimax). With its Internet connection jammed, it would be unable to report anything back, and they would never suspect that a jammer was being used. Jamming cellular voice calls is illega, but...

That depends on the how the power is supplied. If it is supplied through the car battery, then it will be fused to the accessrory fuse, as it would be meant to turn on and off with the key. Puilling that fuse would prevent the device from, and you could not be charged with a crime for pulling...

If the PUC ever does manage to implement that tax, I will solve the problem by getting a non-California number, so I don't have to pay that tax. Metro will let you have a non California number. The PUC cannot tax a number if it s not a California number

I believe it when they say housing is unafforable. When I have driven down to Disneyland from Sacramento, I have seen bumper to bumper traffic on I-5 in Stockton at 4 in the morning, everyone driving to Bay Area jobs, with bumper to bumper traffic until I get past the 205 Interchange.

City AM, at this time, does not detect router level ad blocking, and I have found that Blue Coat's K9 web protection will block ads on City AM, without being detected, at least on Chrome.

When I go to start my filtered VPN, aimed at peoples in schools, offices, net cafes, etc, there will no no access told to advertisers, no matter how much money they pay. Ads will be blocked, no exceptions.

One place that EU law would not apply is the filtered VPN service I plan to start. My VPN would allow people to get past workplace firewalls to get things like internet radio or social media, but still keep the bad stuff, like porn, gambling, and hate speech, out, and I do plan to block ads as...

Shine, who is offering this, have their offices in Israel and the U.S., and since neither country is in the E.U., the EU net neutrality laws would not apply, so these laws do not apply to Shine

That does not work on Taco Bell's Wifi. I tried once manually configuring the DNS server settings, and attempts to access blocked sites were still blocked. Taco Bell found a way to stop that as well.

Even that can be evaded. I have the domains and URLs, for example, that YouTube uses to serve video ads on the blocking list in my router, and the ads still get through. Like I said, Google is doing something sneaky there, so services like Shine are going to have their work cut out for them.

I have found that some sites will detect network level and blocking while others don't. CityAM is an example of that. While I will be blocked if AdBlock is turned on, I find that if I turn AdBlock off, and only use router level blocking, it will still let me access their site. It also depends...