Is it a hidden gem, a cult classic, or hopelessly dumb? We vote "all of the above."
See full article...
See full article...
For me, I really love Armageddon. Is it completely ridiculous? Yes. Unscientific? Double yes. Cheesy as heck? God yes! But it's sooo much fun; just a perfect "turn-your-brain-off-and-enjoy-the-ride" popcorn movie.If I’m going to spend a couple of hours with a space-based movie that stretches the bounds of reality, give me Gravity.
That assumes Starliner finds itself on the launchpad in the future. I'm not so sure it'll ever fly people again.Eric, based on the programs thus far, I'm sure you're much more likely to be accidentally launched into space on a Boeing Starliner than a SpaceX Crew Dragon.
SolarStorm™: Journals from the VoidThat assumes Starliner finds itself on the launchpad in the future. I'm not so sure it'll ever fly people again.
Perhaps Orion though? Imagine Eric - one of SLS's biggest critics - getting accidentally launched into space on one. Then he has to survive a trip around the moon in Orion before using his meteorological skills to avoid a storm at the landing point. The movie practically writes itself.
Having literally seen what people plug LLM's into, with absolutely no restrictions or controls so they can vibe their way to an 'agentic life' - and that SpaceX's IPO self-valuation is 90% Grok - it seems almost inevitable that some future space cock-up will be AI caused. Certainly people were joking about that with New Glenn, e.g. "Blue Origin trained their new flight computer on SpaceX Starship test flight footage, so the AI assumed that exploding was standard operating procedure."Two years ago I'd have said no chance they give an AI enough access to do something like that. Now that feels like the most realistic part of the whole movie.
Thasnk goodness she was never seen again! Oh, wait... Wasn't she on one of the Star Trek: Picard episodesjust a few years ago? And BttF II and III?Lea Thompson's career nose dived after Howard the Duck, that came out shortly afterwards.
You missed Caroline in the city , which I enjoyed. But after you have sex with an anthropomorphic duck you don't get the leads in movies.Thasnk goodness she was never seen again! Oh, wait... Wasn't she on one of the Star Trek: Picard episodesjust a few years ago? And BttF II and III?
But yeah, it did take a hit. I say this as someone who enjoyed (what I recall of) Howard the Duck, but will say there might have been alcohol involved...
SpaceCamp 2: The Joint Congressional Inquiry
is awarded the prize for the space-geekiest line in this review.I also have to imagine that SpaceCamp 2: The Joint Congressional Inquiry would be fascinating
Then he lands in Russian territory and gets arrested for being a war criminal. The sequel is a legal drama crossed with a classic prison-escape caper film.Perhaps Orion though? Imagine Eric - one of SLS's biggest critics - getting accidentally launched into space on one. Then he has to survive a trip around the moon in Orion before using his meteorological skills to avoid a storm at the landing point. The movie practically writes itself.
And this is unfortunate. We're at the point of general perception that AI is so black magic that it can apparently do the literal impossible as in the movie. That will never be believable to me. Sure hand-wavey it happened plot device, big plot hole, Hollywood is clueless, whatever, get on with the movie.Two years ago I'd have said no chance they give an AI enough access to do something like that. Now that feels like the most realistic part of the whole movie.
Tongue in cheek typo?At perigee the shuttle would experience pretty serious atmospheric breaking
… I was maybe 11 years old, I still remember the look of horror on the faces of 30 students and the teacher. It’s a moment forever frozen in time in my brain.
Because that is what the pre-Challenger crews wore in flight.I can forgive the plot armor, but why are they wearing full enclosure helmets without a flight suit to attach it to? It makes them look like kids putting on a motorcycle helmet and pretending to be astronauts.
On second thought, maybe that’s the vibe they were going for.
TIL. Seems like an odd choice in protective gear. Had to be uncomfortable and movement limiting vs a hard hat and sunglasses. Plus wouldn’t those visors fog up pretty quickly?Because that is what the pre-Challenger crews wore in flight.
![]()
NASA was set on a "shirt-sleeves environment" and that extended to launch and re-entry as well.