I have a hard time accepting that a fictional picture that looks like someone constitutes sexual abuse of anyone who thinks it looks like them.
For starters it's so utterly subjective. How much does it need to look like someone to constitute abuse? What if it's a drawing and not AI generated? What if it's just a coincidence that it happens to look like someone? How can something be a crime on the basis of a coincidental similarity?
In a country where something like 40k people get shot and killed every year, don't law enforcement have better things to worry about than horny kids making sexy pictures of their classmates?
For starters it's so utterly subjective. How much does it need to look like someone to constitute abuse? What if it's a drawing and not AI generated? What if it's just a coincidence that it happens to look like someone? How can something be a crime on the basis of a coincidental similarity?
In a country where something like 40k people get shot and killed every year, don't law enforcement have better things to worry about than horny kids making sexy pictures of their classmates?
Upvote
-27
(1
/
-28)