2026 Lucid Air Touring review: This feels like a complete car now

demonbug

Ars Scholae Palatinae
802
Subscriptor
I just read that a four corner full brake job on an electric Taycan can run 18K.

And you will need brake jobs.
Probably depends on which brakes it has; the standard iron Taycan brakes (rotors + pads) look to be about $1.5k in parts from a Porsche dealer, the upgraded Surface Coated Brakes jump up to about $9k in parts (for up to 30% longer life but primarily elimination of brake dust), and then there are the ceramic brakes which are around $1.2k for the pads and around $20k for the rotors, but the rotors are theoretically lifetime parts and shouldn't need replacement unless you break one at $5k+ a pop.
 
Upvote
17 (17 / 0)

NetMage

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
9,741
Subscriptor
Used car listings tend to still be bragging about air conditioning, remote key fob and heated seats and they don't always enter the right features for filters and searches to work correctly.
I tend to use the interior pictures since I know what indicates a particular package, but I missed on my current car that they all had the Map button even if they didn’t have Navigation enabled.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)

NetMage

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
9,741
Subscriptor
I just read that a four corner full brake job on an electric Taycan can run 18K.

And you will need brake jobs.
That would only apply if the Taycan had Ceramic Brakes, which should never need replacing unless you track a lot. Standard brakes on the Taycan are in line with the costs of other luxury vehicles, though, like BMW, it is normal to replace discs and pads at the same time. (So more like $2400 for all four corners.)

Edit: ninja’d
 
Upvote
13 (13 / 0)

clb2c4e

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
145
Do you not know what hands-free means?
You mean something called "Full Self Driving" means hands free only in the absolutely literal sense? That's certainly a choice..

I would expect full self driving means the car can drive itself without constant supervision but then, I also like cars that I won't get burned alive in because they cheaped out on mechanical doors. You do you, I'll carry on here.
 
Upvote
-2 (7 / -9)

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,806
Ars Staff
Why are presumably good cars loosing a lot of value even after light use? Usually finding a lightly used car for quite little money is a signal that the model or the individual car have issues and are hard to sell.
luxury EVs depreciate heavily because luxury car buyers don’t actually want them and need hefty incentives to do so.
 
Upvote
2 (8 / -6)

Errum

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,140
Subscriptor++
I just read that a four corner full brake job on an electric Taycan can run 18K.

And you will need brake jobs.
Porsche service and parts are pricey, but that sort of cost would only be the case with the optional Carbon Ceramic Brakes package. And those are expected to last 100K miles or more in street driving.

Their non-carbon brakes are only averagely expensive, at least by German performance car standards — meaning risk of immediate cardiac arrest for regular car owners.

And for comparison, here’s a set of four carbon ceramic brake disks for a Corvette, a steal at just under $11K: https://www.tritonmotorsportsusa.co...MIkO7u2ayikgMVGXR_AB2u0jJoEAQYASABEgIlu_D_BwE
 
Upvote
12 (12 / 0)

azazel1024

Ars Legatus Legionis
15,020
Subscriptor
Beautiful car. I like the fact that they've focused on efficiency. That's the primary reason to go electric. Why go electric if you're losing a good portion of your energy overcoming aerodynamic losses.

Now if only it was a little lower priced...
Yeah...

I really wish Mazda would get into electrics more.

And had the Miata (bah, or MX-5. Whatever) as an electric option. Go for what makes good sense. Small two door convertible, small battery pack, like around 30kwh. If you get in light weight, good efficiency, you could probably still push that to 150 miles. Not very far, but how many people drive their Miata's far? And that is light enough weight with that small of a battery pack to really keep the driving fun in it. Yes it is possible to do, but it does NOT need AWD. It does not NEED a massive motor. 220-250hp RWD and a 3200-3500lbs curb weight with tight suspension and small size would be AWESOME. I have some faith that Mazda could make it feel like a much lighter MX-5.
 
Upvote
5 (6 / -1)

azazel1024

Ars Legatus Legionis
15,020
Subscriptor
Brake blending does require a new brake-by-wire system. But it does seem like they've left some low-hanging efficiency gains untouched.
Likely why the author saw lower city mileage than highway milage. Unless that was very low highway speeds, that is generally the other way around with an EV or hybrid. But also, yes. Without brake by wire and blended braking, you need to set VERY high regenerative braking settings to effectively turn it into one pedal driving (some people get use to and like one pedal driving, IMHO I hate it), even there, likely you cannot turn the regenerative braking settings high enough for more aggressive braking (not emergency stops, I just mean fairly fast stopping or things like coming to a light or stop sign).
 
Upvote
3 (4 / -1)

azazel1024

Ars Legatus Legionis
15,020
Subscriptor
hahaha I laughed.

That would require probably a fighter's jet or astronaut G-training. =)

edit: bad math 13G is more than a fighter jet pilot would be able to handle I think
Likely more than their fighter could handle without taking the wings off*.

Well trained pilots can handle that kind of G load for single digit seconds without blacking out. Stunt/race planes frequently high 13-16Gs in turns, but they are SLAMMING it for probably 2-3 seconds. Fighter jet pilots on the other hand in high performance jets with light loads are hitting 7-9Gs for 90+ seconds in dog fights or supersonic turns. Probably even most merely mortal humans could handle 13gs for .2 seconds without blacking out. Though if they weren't well braced, that is going to HURT, wrench things, or break bones as you get slammed around (IIRC 20g's is generally about the point where even well braced, that injury starts to occur, with 30-40G being the limit before significant internal injury can occur. Death is ~80-100G). The blood doesn't instantly drain from your brain, and even if it did, your neurons and stuff still retain sufficient oxygenation that you aren't going to lose neural function instantly, it'll take a few seconds.

A G-suit and training of course helps with this significantly. As well as where the G load is (straight back or down is significantly better than up or forward).

*The most high-performance fighter jets can typically hit 9G with minimal air to air loads. Like an F-16 can as an example. One rocking a full fuel and bomb load might only be able to hit 4.5G. Which is typically why if/when in fighter bomber roles, if a jet gets lit up, it ejects its munitions. Something of a tactic used under certain circumstances is lighting up enemy jets to get them to eject their munitions without needing to actually engage them. If I remember right the Iraqi's were doing that with their S300s was setting them to launch mode, without actually launching to trick pilots into thinking a SAM was incoming, and once they ejected munitions, rapidly turn the radar off and relocate (I am probably thinking of a different war, Vietnam?)
 
Last edited:
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)
I drove the Air Pure and Gravity a couple months ago and came away impressed. The ride-handling balance in the Air is exceptional and overall feels more like a driver's car than I expected for a large sedan. Too bad I don't want or need a large sedan. I'd really like an EV car with a hatchback... and good range and driving dynamics. (And, yes, my other car is a manual wagon! :LOL:)
We recently replaced our M3 with an Air for my wife but I'm personally patiently waiting for the Rivian R3. It looks like a vintage Rabbit with big wheels.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)
Phantom braking factored prominently in my decision to ditch my M3, which also carried disabled radar sensing.
FWIW by the time I got rid of my Model 3 last year phantom braking seemed to have been almost entirely cured. That was running FSD v12.x (I had HW3 so never got to try v14.)

For sure, phantom braking is really annoying and unsafe.
 
Upvote
10 (10 / 0)

Gandhim3

Ars Legatus Legionis
11,302
You've made a lot of assumptions. Maybe expensive cars like the Lucid potentially use regen for full braking, I highly doubt that is the case, unless you're inferrring the mechanical brake system is emergency back-up. Cheaper priced EVs, and this example popped up first with my query, like the Fiat 500e use regen until 8 mph, when the normal brakes take over. I'm sure this is the case for older or cheaper ($$) designs.


Lucid Air can use regen to bring the car to a complete stop. The mechanical brakes are engaged in emergency or need faster/quicker stop than the max regen provides.

https://www.jalopnik.com/watch-a-lucid-air-pure-rwd-go-from-0-to-65-mph-and-back-1851142261/

That link is for the RWD Air model which does 0.22G regen braking.The AWD provides even stronger regen at 0.3G.
 
Upvote
4 (5 / -1)
Sounds like a great reason to buy them used.
Considering the issues Jason Fenske had (see the two Engineering Explained youtube videos with his gripes and Lucid's response), I'd try to find a "magic year" that you can expect the software fixed (they fixed mechanical issues quickly enough) but still depreciating like a Maserati.

And depending on my car needs, I'll probably be on the lookout for such.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

Muad'Dib

Ars Scholae Palatinae
639
Subscriptor++
I drove the Air Pure and Gravity a couple months ago and came away impressed. The ride-handling balance in the Air is exceptional and overall feels more like a driver's car than I expected for a large sedan. Too bad I don't want or need a large sedan. I'd really like an EV car with a hatchback... and good range and driving dynamics. (And, yes, my other car is a manual wagon! :LOL:)
You might be interested in the Audi A6/S6 e-tron Sportback, I've been in an S6 since fall and I'm really liking it. The fastback makes it feel almost wagon-like for storage. Range is very solid if you go for an A6 with the smaller wheels. The S6 is a lot of fun to drive.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

kerbaldroptest

Ars Scholae Palatinae
646
Subscriptor
You have to actually finish reading the sentence.

"...from a standing start in just 0.2 seconds more than the McLaren tells you plenty about how much more accessible acceleration has become in the past few decades."
Maybe the actual number isn't that important, but I don't think it's reasonable to expect the average reader to know the McLaren's 0-60 offhand so not saying the Lucid's 0-60 time directly seems needlessly obtuse.
It's a minor nitpick to an otherwise good review!
 
Upvote
7 (9 / -2)

ERIFNOMI

Ars Legatus Legionis
17,191
Maybe the actual number isn't that important, but I don't think it's reasonable to expect the average reader to know the McLaren's 0-60 offhand so not saying the Lucid's 0-60 time directly seems needlessly obtuse.
It's a minor nitpick to an otherwise good review!
The point was it's as near as makes no difference to what was the literal fastest car in the world that kicked off the hypercar era. In the low end spec of a boring 4 door sedan.

The actual time isn't the point, the comparison is.
 
Upvote
12 (14 / -2)

jhandojo

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
158
As much as I love to criticize FSDS, that post also paraphrases to "I don't know anything about how far along other manufacturers are at driver assists but I'd only consider buying a Tesla because they're so far ahead at driver assistance."

Pre-edit, it didn't even mention Lucid.

100% fair paraphrase. I do in fact own a 2025 (HW4) Model Y AWD. I use FSD about 94% of the miles I drive in Greater Houston. I would love to consider another EV, but the immediate caveat is that its self-driving system needs to meet or exceed my current personal satisfaction with FSD.

Not sure why Legatum_of_Kain woke up feeling salty with his reply. Pretty sure it doesn't matter.
 
Upvote
-4 (2 / -6)

Snark218

Ars Legatus Legionis
36,434
Subscriptor
83K I think at that price point I would rather drive a BMW M2. You do not spend 83K to save on gas. Might as well get a fun car.
This is like comparing an M2 to a 7-series. Absolutely inane comparison to draw, and believe it or not you don’t need to announce your buyer preferences to all and sundry unless it's tied to a point that's actually relevant to the topic.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
3 (6 / -3)

ReducedForQuickSale

Smack-Fu Master, in training
92
Neither Tesla (nor Rivian iirc?) do BBW either. But all three offer regenerative braking. Did you not read the part of this article where I said the Lucid does lift-off regen?
Blended braking can be very glitchy. Granted, my hybrid is older, but it does blended regen braking, and let me tell you, braking is by far the worst thing about this car*. Braking is oversensitive, twitchy and grabby, and you can definitely feel the transition between regen and friction. Compare that to our other, non-hybrid vehicles, where braking is linear and predictable.

*One of the best things is that it's too old to have any touch screen controls. It's all physical buttons.
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)

android_alpaca

Ars Praefectus
5,282
Subscriptor
This highly depends on the car. My wife's hyundai has 'highway driving assist', lane keeping + radar cruise. But it wants to feel a torque on the steering wheel to know you have your hands on it still.

Many times on the highway, I'm automatically adjusting my hands the same time it's adjusting things, so it feels no torque and complains that I need to keep my hands on the wheel.. requiring me to periodically nudge it more than I should have to, increasing my cognitive load.
I had the same issue on my car until I learned that moving any dial steering wheel works too. So now I just "fidget" with the volume or temperature control dials on my steering wheel and that keeps the assist system happy.

I do sometimes worry that when level 2/3 (more 3 probably) gets actually good, it will start causing more accidents, since people will trust it too much and not pay enough attention to respond to emerging situations fast enough. Like, I think the mid levels are going to be problematic, even though we need to go through them to get level 4/5 to work well, they aren't going to be a net benefit until we get level 4/5 working well.
This is what Google worried about in the early years and so back in 2017 Waymo said they were explicitly skipping Level 3 to go to Level 4 to avoid the complacency risk.

That being said, on paper "proper" SAE L3 systems are suppose to be true-hands and eye-free within their operational domain and have a "graceful" and safe handover to the driver. So that's suppose to mean that if the driver doesn't takeover in a timely manner, the system should be able to slowdown and stop (ideally out of the traffic lane) by itself without accident. We'll have to see if the implementation actually meet that metric but afaict Mercedes SAE Level 3 and Honda SAE Level 3 systems are suppose to do this and there should never be an "emergency action" that is needed by the driver.

From what I've read Mercedes and Honda takae legal/financial liability of the vehicle until the driver takes over (I don't think they don't count being "stalled" on the highway as their responsibility as long as they safely stopped the car).
 
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)

vought1221

Ars Scholae Palatinae
771
Subscriptor++
Pardon my ignorance here, but are there any auto manufacturers that have autonomous (-ish) driving systems as far along as Tesla's supervised FSD?

Reason I ask is, that's really the only reason keeping me from exploring other EV car makers here in the States.

Inasmuch as I would love to own say a Rivian (price notwithstanding) as an EV SUV or a Lucid, there's no way I would give up FSD (Supervised) for it.

I'd like to think it is just a matter of time before there is more parity, I'm just not sure how soon we are realistically talking.

Edit: Added Lucid to list of EVs I would personally consider to keep this comment related to the article.. car is a beaut, Clark!
I’ve been driving for 35 years.

Do me a favor and learn to drive before you trust a robot to do it. Put yourself in some genuinely threshold situations by doing a track day, and learn how to drive at the edge before you decide it’s worth trusting a robot.

I don’t trust your robot, I sure as shit don’t trust Tesla’s software and their half-assed approach to computer vision, and I think anybody who is lazy enough but privileged enough to buy a car that purports to drive itself and be “as safe as a human” probably ought to have their head examined.

Seriously. If you don’t like to drive, take a bus.
 
Upvote
7 (15 / -8)

vought1221

Ars Scholae Palatinae
771
Subscriptor++
Not sure what this is even supposed to mean. FSD is an incredibly advanced hands-free system. It's valid to ask if other cars have something comparable. Also, Lucid has had its own quality issues over the years. Sounds like you just want to complain about Tesla. Not helpful.

This is truly a bummer. It doesn't seem that hard to do brake blending.
It’s not a bummer if you desire repeatable braking progression around the track or when driving aggressively.

Lucid is staffed with people who actually enjoy driving. Tesla seems to prefer its space as a cute appliance that’s got a worsening reputation.
 
Upvote
-3 (5 / -8)

Snark218

Ars Legatus Legionis
36,434
Subscriptor
hahaha I laughed.

That would require probably a fighter's jet or astronaut G-training. =)

edit: bad math 13G is more than a fighter jet pilot would be able to handle I think
The maximum deceleration force ever experienced by a human who lived to tell about it was 46G - briefly - by Col. John Stapp on the High Speed Test Track at Holloman AFB, NM. Apparently his eyes hemorrhaged.
 
Upvote
8 (8 / 0)

IrishMonkee

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,362
Likely more than their fighter could handle without taking the wings off*.

Well trained pilots can handle that kind of G load for single digit seconds without blacking out. Stunt/race planes frequently high 13-16Gs in turns, but they are SLAMMING it for probably 2-3 seconds. Fighter jet pilots on the other hand in high performance jets with light loads are hitting 7-9Gs for 90+ seconds in dog fights or supersonic turns. Probably even most merely mortal humans could handle 13gs for .2 seconds without blacking out. Though if they weren't well braced, that is going to HURT, wrench things, or break bones as you get slammed around (IIRC 20g's is generally about the point where even well braced, that injury starts to occur, with 30-40G being the limit before significant internal injury can occur. Death is ~80-100G). The blood doesn't instantly drain from your brain, and even if it did, your neurons and stuff still retain sufficient oxygenation that you aren't going to lose neural function instantly, it'll take a few seconds.

A G-suit and training of course helps with this significantly. As well as where the G load is (straight back or down is significantly better than up or forward).

*The most high-performance fighter jets can typically hit 9G with minimal air to air loads. Like an F-16 can as an example. One rocking a full fuel and bomb load might only be able to hit 4.5G. Which is typically why if/when in fighter bomber roles, if a jet gets lit up, it ejects its munitions. Something of a tactic used under certain circumstances is lighting up enemy jets to get them to eject their munitions without needing to actually engage them. If I remember right the Iraqi's were doing that with their S300s was setting them to launch mode, without actually launching to trick pilots into thinking a SAM was incoming, and once they ejected munitions, rapidly turn the radar off and relocate (I am probably thinking of a different war, Vietnam?)
If you're thinking Iraq then it wouldn't be the S-300 as Iraq appears to still be in talks with Russia on some kind of deal to acquire. Vietnam didn't have them back then as S-300 production didn't start until '75. But both wars share the use of the different SAM flavors of S-25/75/125 with the S-75 being highly effective for Vietnam. It's also the SAM used to shoot down the U2s over Russia and Cuba.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)

oblixion

Smack-Fu Master, in training
74
You mean something called "Full Self Driving" means hands free only in the absolutely literal sense? That's certainly a choice..

I would expect full self driving means the car can drive itself without constant supervision but then, I also like cars that I won't get burned alive in because they cheaped out on mechanical doors. You do you, I'll carry on here.
I only ever said it's hands-free. Not sure what you're on about.
 
Upvote
-4 (4 / -8)

ERIFNOMI

Ars Legatus Legionis
17,191
It’s not a bummer if you desire repeatable braking progression around the track or when driving aggressively.

Lucid is staffed with people who actually enjoy driving. Tesla seems to prefer its space as a cute appliance that’s got a worsening reputation.
Wow you have no idea what you're talking about.

Blended braking can provide the same amount of braking force while blending different amounts of regen and friction brakes. Blending is, er, blending.

But the best part is you apparently accusing me of defending Tesla? When Tesla doesn't blend breaking?
 
Upvote
4 (6 / -2)

dwolvin

Smack-Fu Master, in training
67
Subscriptor
I test drove a Lucid in June. It ruined all other EVs for me.
I won't quite say ruined, it's just too big. But it is like sitting in a Rolex. I'll stick with my 2018 model 3 with EAP (the lower FSD option) for a while, and hope there is something better when I need a new vehicle.
 
Upvote
-4 (0 / -4)
The area I work nearby, is one of the "semi-rich" higher end middle-class areas of North San Diego. There are tons of EVs circling this area and wonder if there are enough EV chargers as I see a line of EVs waiting to access them. I still want to stab my eyes out, for all the filthy Tesla and LED equipped SUVs blinding me at night. Anyways, those Lucid Airs are pretty good in the hands of decent drivers at least. Range is superior but thats at the added costs compared to the sub 330mi ish range EVs that are 10K-20K cheaper than a Lucid other than perhaps a Rivian?? The Costco is a war zone where you wonder if they know how to drive properly compared to other Costco's in the SD area.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)

OSB

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,503
Subscriptor
How are the lower levels of driver assist? When I test drive a lucid air pure about a year ago, only the highest level (which wasn't actually available on any cars in stock) had lane keeping assist. The lower level you could actually buy was just radar cruise control and lane departure warning. This was a huge miss for me. I don't have any desire for hands free driving or auto navigation, but I thought lane centering should be a base line feature for an electric luxury sedan.

Edit: it looks like "Dream Drive Premium" still doesn't have lane centering assist, only lane departure correction. You need "Dream Drive Pro" for that. And it still looks like that is only an available feature on the "Touring" and above trims, and even then not universal. This seems like a huge miss.
I like so much of what Lucid are doing, but the pricing structuring of their ADAS system is poor. Then again they won't be on my "consider" list until they improve their dealer network in Canada, anyhow.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

ghub005

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
8,693
I worry about all the software in these rolling computers on wheels.

All that functionality requires updates … and future updates require the manufacturer to stay in business and retain a willingness to provide support for older models.

And frankly I don’t think both of those things will happen.

It’s not a problem that is unique to Lucid. Just ask any Fiskar Karma owners about their ownership experience.
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)

Vnend

Ars Scholae Palatinae
904
Subscriptor++
The maximum deceleration force ever experienced by a human who lived to tell about it was 46G - briefly - by Col. John Stapp on the High Speed Test Track at Holloman AFB, NM. Apparently his eyes hemorrhaged.

It has been at least 45 years since I read about it, but during WWII, a crew member of a B17 survived jumping out of his aircraft at an estimated 15K feet after it took severe AA fire during a bombing mission. He suffered broken bones, and possibly other injuries but landed in a snow covered forest (conifers). The German soldiers who found him doubted his story, but after his parachute was found at the plane's crash site, they started toasting his unlikely survival with him until his injuries didn't bother him...

I could be wrong, but would be surprised if he didn't exceed 46 Gs landing as he did.
 
Upvote
-4 (0 / -4)

kerbaldroptest

Ars Scholae Palatinae
646
Subscriptor
The point was it's as near as makes no difference to what was the literal fastest car in the world that kicked off the hypercar era. In the low end spec of a boring 4 door sedan.

The actual time isn't the point, the comparison is.
Yeah that's fair, and it definitely conveys the 'this car is really quick' message as-is. Though as a not-a-car person, your explanation of the F1 is context that I was missing to 'get it'. Cause yeah, when you say it like that, that's actually absurd!
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,806
Ars Staff
Blended braking can be very glitchy. Granted, my hybrid is older, but it does blended regen braking, and let me tell you, braking is by far the worst thing about this car*. Braking is oversensitive, twitchy and grabby, and you can definitely feel the transition between regen and friction. Compare that to our other, non-hybrid vehicles, where braking is linear and predictable.

*One of the best things is that it's too old to have any touch screen controls. It's all physical buttons.
Yes, pedal feel isn't always good, but it also isn't always bad—some implementations you can't really tell when the friction brakes kick in.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
Lower cognitive load.

With lane keeping, you can just rest your hands on the wheel and the let the car take you down the highway, without needing to make constant adjustments. Auto lane change means just hit your turn signal and the car will change lanes for you.

It is entirely analogous to what TACC does for your use of the accelerator and brake pedal... relieve you from the need to make constant adjustments. L2 systems do the same for the steering wheel.

Tesla's FSD takes it further by (a) being able to work on local roads, and (b) understanding navigation. So when you need to get off at an exit, it'll do it for you completely. Typically I would disengage once I got off the highway but it was nice to let the car take me to that point on its own.

Not everyone likes this sort of thing but I'm a big fan. Made my daily 40 minute commute much more relaxing.
The best part of lane keeping for me is it takes the pressure off my arms on straight roads. Lanes are tilted left or right for drainage, so even on a straight road you have to hold left or right pressure on the wheel the whole time. LKA takes that for you.

PS: my late model RAV4 is often dumb and thinks I’m touching the steering wheel when I’m not. So I can go minutes on end with hands on thighs. Even more relaxing! Eyes on road obv.
 
Upvote
-1 (2 / -3)
I just read that a four corner full brake job on an electric Taycan can run 18K.

And you will need brake jobs.
Do your own brake jobs guys. It’s really easy. Just watch a YouTube video on your specific car. I do many of my friends and family’s. Can’t say I’ve done a Porsche, but my neighbor does his 911 brakes.
 
Upvote
3 (4 / -1)