Slight correction to make it more accurate.It's likecardesigners hate people
Even less so in an EV where they're essentially never used.Unless you're racing, you don't need to cool the brakes any more today than we did back when we had 14" wheels.
old and still working. KISS is the best engineering advice every engineer should understand.
Sort of. Freezing rain itself isn't a big deal because the ice forms outside the handle, where you can easily chip it away. The problem is more likely when you had non-freezing rain, followed by a drop in temperature, so that water penetrates inside the handle and then freezes.I bet [push-pull handles] suck shit in freezing rain as well.
You have to engineer brakes for the worst case scenario. Sure, they may not be used very often in an EV with good regeneration. But the demand on braking is directly proportional to the mass of the vehicle, and directly proportional to the square of the velocity. So a heavy car, going fast, puts an enormous ask on the brakes when being used hard. Does that sound like an EV? It should. EVs have waaaay more brake than they need for normal driving because when they have to allow for all use cases.Even less so in an EV where they're essentially never used.
This is exactly how the flush door handles from manufacturers other than Tesla work. In fact, almost all the problems cited in the article are specific to Tesla's baffling handle implementations.One would think some sort of flush mechanical design could work. like it's flush with the door, but you push it in and it pops the door open or something like that. I'm not a design engineer though, so I could be wrong about the simplicity of this.
Agreed. Though I will point out that reaching out towards the door is a required motion that possibly could be counted as step one of two for pull handles.I don't like 2 motions to operate a door. Give me a single pull (or lift if it's an old Lambo).
That's in the back.Didn't drivers die in a Tesla because power was cut, and only way to open from the inside was from a lever in the back of the car, below the seat? How can you see this when the cabin is filling with smoke?
Door handles should be manual, and easily accessed from inside as well as outside. 1980's flush handles are calling... (credit to username barich)
I don't think the raw rubber content is much of the cost between two equal diameter tires but different sidewall diameters. Most of it is there in the smaller sidewall tire. The tread is the same after all, and the addition to the larger sidewall tire is to a decreasing inner diameter.Assuming the OD to be the same, wouldn't smaller tyre walls make them less expensive and easier to manufacture?
Generally when there are different wheel sizes, the OD of the tyre is the same in all cases.
I have tended to assume that bigger wheels and tyres overall are associated with the worsening of potholes, since bigger wheels are less likely to fall into small ones. Original Minis with their small wheels are pretty dangerous on our post-Conservative potholed roads.
BMW designers absolutely HATE drivers that don't want to spend outrageous sums of money doing maintenance and repairs on their cars....always have, always will. I sort of hate my E46 M3 more than love it.It's like car designers hate people
Only from the outside. On the inside you can trigger the mechanical latch by pulling the door handle.The doors on my Mach E are all electronic. Push the little button on the door, it pops open. It's cool, but if the 12v battery ever dies, I'm in for it. There's a way to provide external 12v power, but it's not exactly simple. And all to open the door.
The current version of this looks plenty modern:Good. Ban electronic door releases on the inside, too. Even if they have mechanical backups. Nobody should have to try to locate a hidden mechanical backup that they normally don't use in an emergency.
As for drag reduction, would a return to the 80s-90s help?
View attachment 117698
On average yes, but brakes have to handle the "battery is full and I'm barrelling down I80 from Tahoe" case. You can't undersize them despite having the battery. You just don't need to size them for the race track.Even less so in an EV where they're essentially never used.
still easier to overcome than a dead battery on a flush electronic door handle, hot water and excesssive force go along way to loosen up mecahncial parts. (if your car door froze shut your 12v battery is also likely dead)Unfortunately, the button on that handle is quite prone to freezing in the right sort of weather, and becoming quite immovable. Lots of experience with that problem.
Am I the only one that also misses the manual window handles instead of electric windows?You should never need power to open a door on a vehicle. Full stop.
That button design was garbage 55 years ago and still is. You've got no leverage to break ice with that.View attachment 11770355 years old and still working. KISS is the best engineering advice every engineer should understand.
You need the brakes to be able to stop the car without the assist from the motors. You don't need the brakes of your computer EV to be able to stay cool while doing laps of Laguna Seca indefinitely.You have to engineer brakes for the worst case scenario. Sure, they may not be used very often in an EV with good regeneration. But the demand on braking is directly proportional to the mass of the vehicle, and directly proportional to the square of the velocity. So a heavy car, going fast, puts an enormous ask on the brakes when being used hard. Does that sound like an EV? It should. EVs have waaaay more brake than they need for normal driving because when they have to allow for all use cases.
This also drives larger diameter wheels, because now you have to package the big rotors which are the primary heat sink for the brakes. The Model 3 uses 14" diameter rotors, which means that realistically you're going to have to run 18" wheels at a minimum. Guess what the standard wheel size is for the 3?
In icy conditions the 3/Y handles are ok in my experience. With a glove on you kind of make a fist and pound the flat surface around the handle, which cracks the ice and frees it. Because its just a flat door panel it doesn't require much force or hurt your hand.Which basically describes how the Model 3 and Model Y door handles work. They still have problems with getting jammed up with ice, and I'm not sure if they are any more susceptible to failure in side impacts as a door handle with a "standard" hinge mechanism.
Rivians uses a similar hinge mechanism, but present themselves when you approach the vehicle. So it's kind of a hybrid. The Gen 1s use a mechanical latch that doesn't require electricity to operate, but I've heard that the Gen 2s use an electromechanical latch.
Edit: Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you're suggesting, but the Model 3/Y work by pushing one end of the handle that pops out the opposite end that the user pulls to mechanically unlatch the door. Is this different than what you're suggesting?
Tesla already tries to guess whether you want to drive forward or backwards. Don't give them any more ideas.How long till they go the other way of safety and implement ai into when and how to open the doors?
At least China is looking at it, my wifes US car had a recall about doors not latching properly and the dealership said it would be months before they had parts, and to just hold the door closed if it popped open.
Yes.Am I the only one that also misses the manual window handles instead of electric windows?
I had a LeBaron that had the motorized headlight covers. Whenever we would get snow or ice some would get in there and freeze everything up. I'd have to sit and wait for the headlight to warm up the mechanisms inside before the cover would open. That's a design I'm glad went away.Reminds me of those pop-up motorized headlights, or the motorized shoulder seat belts from decades back.
In the long run, I bet these silly door handles go the same way.
Am I the only one that also misses the manual window handles instead of electric windows?
Given cars that have twice the mass of the ones in the days of the 14 inch wheels, I would need to see experimental evidence of that. Since those days, ventilated discs at the front became more common, and I don't think that was a fashion item. Brake loading has been increasing along with vehicle mass and horsepower.Unless you're racing, you don't need to cool the brakes any more today than we did back when we had 14" wheels.
Some of the early versions of those didn't use electric motors but engine vacuum. Which gives me a really terrible idea for powering door handles...Reminds me of those pop-up motorized headlights
I'm not saying you undersize them. Brakes have always been (well should have always been) sized to get the job done in normal situations, but they're certainly not impossible to overheat. That's why you're not supposed to ride your brakes while drive down a mountain. You absolutely can overheat your brakes if you're stupid.On average yes, but brakes have to handle the "battery is full and I'm barrelling down I80 from Tahoe" case. You can't undersize them despite having the battery. You just don't need to size them for the race track.
KISS is the best engineering advice every engineer should understand.
Why TF is there even a push button on a car handle? I've never seen such a design before. Always a simple hinged latch. What's the button even for?That button design was garbage 55 years ago and still is. You've got no leverage to break ice with that.