[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28317281#p28317281:1lw30i7f said:DrPizza[/url]":1lw30i7f]It does, however, mean that there is no value in talking about the issue in this context. It just gives credence to the assholes that they do not deserve.Just because something is used as a pretext doesn't necessarily invalidate the issue itself.
With this I agree. Issues should be looked at by themselves instead of being part of some ideological battle. Personally I find most, if not all, things done in service of any ideology to be fairly pointless.
But other than Kyle Orland's article regarding the mailing list, I don't think I've seen any article on the issue of ethics,
I'm not redefining a damn thing. I'm demonstrating the ability to read and understand.And the round of articles from the end of August didn't say "Gamers who are assholes are dead", they just said "Gamers are dead." I'm not sure that you can post hoc redefine what was written.
You're reading and understanding from the perspective of the authors. Others not privy to behind the scenes discussions may not have the same understanding because their perspective or the context in which they're reading the articles is different.
Upvote
-36
(6
/
-42)