Water utility announces it’s ditching fluoride—then reveals it did so years ago

t-doggy

Smack-Fu Master, in training
17
Isn’t this a perfect opportunity to study the science further? You have an entire community of people that were essentially given placebo (thinking their water is fluoridated, but wasn’t). So these people would not have made any change to their brushing or fluoridation habits.

Now, what health impacts can be measured now after 2 years, versus in earlier years?
 
Upvote
44 (44 / 0)

good_ol_dog

Smack-Fu Master, in training
55
Subscriptor
My instinct was to downvote this (seeming) nonsense. And in order to disprove it, I put "mouthwash" into US Amazon (delivery zip 90210) and checked if the first 15 results contained fluoride, 2/3 of them don't, I wouldn't call that "almost all" and I didn't check for alcohol, but I think that given this evidence, your comment is justified.


A sad thing is my top hit for Alcohol Free Mouthwash is “Crest Pro-Health Advanced Mouthwash, Alcohol Free, Multi-Protection” advertising a “New Fresh Flavor” with associated fresh packaging. It still has Fluoride in it but the mention is only in the active ingredients instead of twice on the front label.
 
Upvote
7 (7 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

norton_I

Ars Praefectus
5,904
Subscriptor++
I never would have expected Dr. Strangelove to age so poorly. When it was written, ranting about water fluoridation was suitable for indicating complete madness in a fictional character.

I mean, yes but the Dr. Strangelove characterization was based on real political movements with a lot of power and money. It wasn't supposed to be a fantasy, it was supposed to be "if we take the loony bins who have a lot of power at their word, this is how bad it could be" Anti-fluoridation was big in the John Birch society types back in the 1950s, and was deemed a communist plot.

In the 70s through the 90s, it became a lot less culturally relevant, so to people who first saw Dr. Strangelove in the 80s and 90s, it might have been seen as a bit of absurdist satire, picking something outlandish to be paranoid about. And of course it is absurd, but people watching it in the 60s would have recognized it as something absurd that real people promoted.
 
Upvote
59 (59 / 0)
Grew up out on well water. I'm the only one with most of my teeth. My siblings, my uncles, all have dentures. Hell My uncles had dentures by the time they were 25. I do recall for that I took fluoride tablets the dentist prescribed. But that was during a time Dad was fully employed. So maybe that small stretch helped my teeth.
Oddly enough after college, I didn't get to a dentist for.....a very long time. Lack of insurance, fear of the dentist, and when I finally did, 3 cavities but none so bad that I was in any pain.
 
Upvote
16 (17 / -1)
You know what I wonder though? - if the lingering effect of having had flouride still provided some protection so that the numbers haven't yet ticked up all that much. The window-licking trump sluts will claim this a victory, and proof the flouride was never doing anything. I wonder.
Oh I'm sure it would have a delayed reaction which the rubes would say "see it didn't hurt nothing"
 
Upvote
9 (9 / 0)

graylshaped

Ars Legatus Legionis
68,732
Subscriptor++
My late Mom was a dentist. She started practicing at around the time Dr. Strangelove was released, in which film a fluoride conspiracist is portrayed as a bug-eyed lunatic. And theatre audiences laughed. Because it was ridiculous. This shit was thoroughly evaluated as paranoid nonsense over SIXTY YEARS AGO. What is even happening?
I was ready to chalk it up to Alabama Alabama-ing, but yeah. This shit oozes out into all the cracks and crevices.
 
Upvote
10 (11 / -1)

atmartens

Ars Praetorian
513
Subscriptor
I never would have expected Dr. Strangelove to age so poorly. When it was written, ranting about water fluoridation was suitable for indicating complete madness in a fictional character.
Actually, Ripper's character was implicitly an adherent of the John Birch society. Rabidly anti-Communist, conspiratorial, against the civil rights movement. Trump's father was a big fan. Trumpism and the JBS have big overlaps.
 
Upvote
56 (56 / 0)

Pluvia Arenae

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,872
Subscriptor++
My instinct was to downvote this (seeming) nonsense. And in order to disprove it, I put "mouthwash" into US Amazon (delivery zip 90210) and checked if the first 15 results contained fluoride, 2/3 of them don't, I wouldn't call that "almost all" and I didn't check for alcohol, but I think that given this evidence, your comment is justified.
The way I learned about dental hygiene, there are alcohol/antiseptic mouthwashes, and there are fluoride mouthwashes, and they're supposed to be used differently, so I don't think it makes sense to put them both in the same product.

Antiseptic mouthwash kills bacteria while you're swishing it around, and then you can rinse out the residue with water. But for a fluoride mouthwash, after spitting it out, you're supposed to leave the residue in your mouth and not eat or drink for about half an hour, so that your teeth have time to absorb enough fluoride.
 
Upvote
39 (39 / 0)

murty

Ars Centurion
344
Subscriptor++
Of all the things I love about living in Portland, OR, one thing I utterly hate is how we’ve long been held captive to the anti-fluoride conspiracy theorists.

Whenever legislation comes up to fix that, the scare machines crank up their output to overdrive and convince enough rubes to vote against it… again, and again, and again…

Anecdotally, I’ve heard from countless people I know (as well as random folks online), about stories of folks who’ve moved here recently going to the dentist, only to have the dentist reply that ‘you must not have grown up here’ due to the fact they grew up in a place that fluoridated their and their teeth are jacked up as a result.

Seriously depressing the number of ways we’ve stepped backwards in public health in the last several decades thanks to a mixture of conspiracy theorists and lobbying from industries that seek to make money off of the the harms that come from said roll backs.
 
Upvote
28 (28 / 0)
We actually have the makings of a pretty amazing natural experiment here if someone can sample dental records before and after the change several years ago.

Which is what I would say if didn't already do this experiment in goddamn 1945.

The Fluoridation Trials were incredibly robust. They ran for 15 years and paired cities that introduced fluoride with a control city that did not introduce fluoride, usually a neighboring city with a similar water supply. They also included cities that had high levels of naturally-occurring fluoride already in their water because they also wanted to test if there was a difference between naturally occurring fluoridation vs treated water.

One control city Muskegon, who was paired with Grand Rapids, MI, withdrew from the study after only 6 years because the effects in Grand Rapids were so positive that the city didn't want to wait another 9 years for the study to end to introduce fluoride. That effectively ended the study for those two cities but they continued to gather dental records for both. And 9 years later in 1960 Muskegon had "caught up" to Grand Rapids in terms of dental health, despite starting so much later.

Good general overview:
https://www.cdc.gov/fluoridation/timeline-for-community-water-fluoridation/index.html
 
Upvote
68 (68 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

Insomnomaniac

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
136
Alabama, you say? Somebody tell them fluoride will help keep their smiles as white as possible.

Bet they start looking for the "on" switch then. 🤨

CDN media
 
Upvote
12 (14 / -2)

Statistical

Ars Legatus Legionis
55,747
It's trendy to blame people now, but you do realize that US elections, like many other countries, is basically voting between 2 bad choices and trying to decide which one you can tolerate more.

As for doing research on candidates for each election, its not a trivial task since majority of the media is extremely biased. Besides which, people are busy with work (or in the current economy, trying to find one), study, family etc. The problem with 'because your daddy did it' is simply that dad or grandpa should've done their research and then hopefully the party/person chosen was consistent in their positions. If so, why not crib their 'answer' (I.e. where to vote) and save yourself the headache?

I agree that we should vote right and not be blind lemmings, but the establishment and 2 party 'competition' makes it extremely hard. With US as example, if both major parties have some points I dislike - whether its pandering to corporations & billionaires or illegal immigrants & unions - there is no credible third choice that has a sane stance.

Imagine being a "both parties are bad" person in 2026. JFC.
 
Upvote
77 (80 / -3)

mikeschr

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,519
Subscriptor++
Apparently in Alabama they get their science from Dr Strangelove as god intended.
This type of thing usually leans to the right these days, but here in Portland fluoridation still fails every time it's put on the ballot. The anti-fluoride people buy a lot of ads along the lines of "keep Portland water pure, without additives", failing to mention that chemicals are already added to it. It's entirely deceptive.
 
Upvote
28 (28 / 0)

Resistance

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
681
It's trendy to blame people now, but you do realize that US elections, like many other countries, is basically voting between 2 bad choices and trying to decide which one you can tolerate more.

As for doing research on candidates for each election, its not a trivial task since majority of the media is extremely biased. Besides which, people are busy with work (or in the current economy, trying to find one), study, family etc. The problem with 'because your daddy did it' is simply that dad or grandpa should've done their research and then hopefully the party/person chosen was consistent in their positions. If so, why not crib their 'answer' (I.e. where to vote) and save yourself the headache?

I agree that we should vote right and not be blind lemmings, but the establishment and 2 party 'competition' makes it extremely hard. With US as example, if both major parties have some points I dislike - whether its pandering to corporations & billionaires or illegal immigrants & unions - there is no credible third choice that has a sane stance.
Primaries are a thing.
 
Upvote
14 (14 / 0)

LordEOD

Ars Scholae Palatinae
791
I imagine that, by this point, the fluoridation systems are either barely functional or outright non-functional due to neglect or even purposeful (and unlawful) dismantling.

Since the body was in violation of the law by not informing the public, I would hold the individuals that voted for the changes to be personally liable for the system reconstruction costs.

Further, if sufficient evidence is produced that an individual suffered dental harm as a result of this unannounced change, then those costs too would be distributed among the voting members to pay in restitution.

That is the only way to both achieve justice and to deter future unlawful and rogue acts.
 
Upvote
17 (17 / 0)

RockIslandLine

Ars Centurion
288
Subscriptor
As for doing research on candidates for each election, its not a trivial task since majority of the media is extremely biased.
Yes, the US media is completely in the tank for conservatives.
Did I miss the months of wall to wall coverage about a certain presidential candidate's mental defects? Oh, wait ...
 
Upvote
19 (20 / -1)

Madestjohn

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,803
Sorry, "jacked up?"

jack up

1 (jack something up, jack up something)
raise something, especially a vehicle, with a jack
: jack the car up until the wheel can spin freely.
informal increase something by a considerable amount: France jacked up its key bank interest rate.

2 informal inject oneself with an illegal drug: we stepped over people jacking up in the street outside.

3 Australian give up or refuse to participate in something: they'd just jack up and go on strike.

4 (jack something up, jack up something) New Zealand informal
arrange or organize something: they did a national service in jacking this racing up.

?
Jack is a jack of all trades Definitions
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)

murty

Ars Centurion
344
Subscriptor++
Sorry, "jacked up?"

jack up

1 (jack something up, jack up something)
raise something, especially a vehicle, with a jack
: jack the car up until the wheel can spin freely.
informal increase something by a considerable amount: France jacked up its key bank interest rate.

2 informal inject oneself with an illegal drug: we stepped over people jacking up in the street outside.

3 Australian give up or refuse to participate in something: they'd just jack up and go on strike.

4 (jack something up, jack up something) New Zealand informal
arrange or organize something: they did a national service in jacking this racing up.

?
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/jacked-up5
5 - usually jacked up informal : injured or hurt -
"My neck is pretty jacked up, and a lot of it is because of what I've done in the past.”
 
Upvote
15 (15 / 0)

KeyboardWeeb

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,944
Subscriptor
It's trendy to blame people now, but you do realize that US elections, like many other countries, is basically voting between 2 bad choices and trying to decide which one you can tolerate more.

As for doing research on candidates for each election, its not a trivial task since majority of the media is extremely biased. Besides which, people are busy with work (or in the current economy, trying to find one), study, family etc. The problem with 'because your daddy did it' is simply that dad or grandpa should've done their research and then hopefully the party/person chosen was consistent in their positions. If so, why not crib their 'answer' (I.e. where to vote) and save yourself the headache?

I agree that we should vote right and not be blind lemmings, but the establishment and 2 party 'competition' makes it extremely hard. With US as example, if both major parties have some points I dislike - whether its pandering to corporations & billionaires or illegal immigrants & unions - there is no credible third choice that has a sane stance.
It's not hard, the League of Women Voters puts out handy guides you can find online and in most public libraries. And this both sides-ism has to stop.
 
Upvote
42 (43 / -1)

Madestjohn

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,803
It's not hard, the League of Women Voters puts out handy guides you can find online and in most public libraries. And this both sides-ism has to stop.
.. don’t worry Trump will fix it !


Deciding between two political parties too difficult for you ?
(even when the differences are spelled out in simplistic jingoistic slogans)
How about ONE party !

Tired of having to listen to all the both side-ism ??
How about all Fox on all the channels all the time!
( or you can always switch OAN when the infomercial are playing)

Tired of having to go back to the voting booths again and again every 2 or 4 years???
TRUMP WILL FIX IT!
“You won’t have to do it anymore. Four years, it will be fixed, it will be fine. You won’t have to vote anymore.. In four years, you won’t have to vote again. “ - DJT July 2024
 
Upvote
19 (19 / 0)