So-called "wrench attacks" are more common as Bitcoin's value increases, reports say.
See full article...
See full article...
This is a race of who can post this the fastest.View attachment 110335
"Nah man, you want the other Lebowski!"My fear would be that one day someone may refuse to believe I don’t own any bitcoin. How do you prove a negative like this to the Toecutter?
Woeltz was apparently well-known in certain US crypto circles. He once served as managing director of Silicon River Capital, an investment fund focused on blockchain technology. And currently, he is an advisor to a Kentucky state office of technology working group, helping lawmakers "use block chain technology to protect natural gas pipelines, telecommunications and other infrastructure," the NYT reported.
It's like when people/jobs ask for what your socials are and you tell them "none". They just don't believe you and assume you are lying.My fear would be that one day someone may refuse to believe I don’t own any bitcoin. How do you prove a negative like this to the Toecutter?
Use unregulated currencies, expect unregulated actions.
No, because anything over $10k instantly triggers money laundering investigations. This dumb ass danger is pretty much unique to crypto and cash.Non-crypto billionaires have bodyguards for a reason.
I'm pretty sure it's easier to defeat the 2FA at my (major) bank than to try to hide a few hundred millions in crypto through tumblers.
I know this one was a convenient know-the-mark job, but can we direct all that ... "entrepreneurial energy" towards more worthy targets ?
Banks have additional security measures that make stealing that much money almost impossible.Non-crypto billionaires have bodyguards for a reason.
I'm pretty sure it's easier to defeat the 2FA at my (major) bank than to try to hide a few hundred millions in crypto through tumblers.
I know this one was a convenient know-the-mark job, but can we direct all that ... "entrepreneurial energy" towards more worthy targets ?
XKCD moment...I mean, I'm pretty sure this is exactly what the author was referencing when they used the term "wrench attacks" in the sub-heading.
Two butlers onsite agreed to be interviewed.
Be broke?My fear would be that one day someone may refuse to believe I don’t own any bitcoin. How do you prove a negative like this to the Toecutter?
This phrasing just makes me think of Hayden Christiansen attacking someone for their Bitcoinwhere bad actors physically attack cryptocurrency holders
UUCEUA is not as catchy as FAFO.Use unregulated currencies, expect unregulated actions.
"Nah man, you want the other Lebowski!"
You can ask Jeeves...If there's anything in the article that left me wanting to know more, it's
Execute a very tight ten minute stand up set mocking cryptocurrency and finish it with a Rodney Dangerfield impression, "Cryptocurrency? Common! I at least got some self respect!"My fear would be that one day someone may refuse to believe I don’t own any bitcoin. How do you prove a negative like this to the Toecutter?
I think one of them writes for Axios.Where are Ars' right wing crypto shills to argue this would have happened anyway with fiat currencies?
There's a lot of pro-crypto commenters who have a lot of fucking explaining to do that can't be called out by username.
That is the absolute dumbest fucking take on the subject possible. Tell me, how do you expect to get things like stopping meatpackers from putting sawdust in sausage without regulation? How do you expect to get companies to stop dumping pollution in the water supply without regulation?if regulation prevented crime, we’d have no need for police.
Jeeves, bring me the gold plated wrench and more sparkling water for the foot bath.You can ask Jeeves...
regulation is the seatbelt; enforcement is the brake, nobody said toss out the brakes.
"Two butlers onsite agreed to be interviewed."
You mean, coitus?No funny shtuff.
It's like when people/jobs ask for what your socials are and you tell them "none". They just don't believe you and assume you are lying.