Don’t watermark your legal PDFs with purple dragons in suits

Post content hidden for low score. Show…

Drizzt321

Ars Legatus Legionis
33,325
Subscriptor++
I think even more horrifying is

...says that the firm "integrates AI to lower the cost of legal services."

I'm sure eventually it get to be useful, but AFAIK it's mostly more trouble than it's worth to lawyers because you have to go through and check every single link and citation/etc.
 
Upvote
145 (145 / 0)

Maestro4k

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,538
I think even more horrifying is



I'm sure eventually it get to be useful, but AFAIK it's mostly more trouble than it's worth to lawyers because you have to go through and check every single link and citation/etc.
Since this particular lawyer was dumb enough to watermark every page of his filing with a large image of a dragon in a suit, drawing a predictable rebuke from the judge, the odds he's going to do that are very, very small. Probably only a matter of time before this or another judge is punishing him for AI hallucinationed cites.

Edit: Why the hell did spellcheck change cites to votes? Fixed.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
84 (85 / -1)

terrydactyl

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,889
Subscriptor
The whole story would be far more humorous were it not from a case in which Perrone represented a woman who claims that she nearly died after being incarcerated and not given proper medical care. Perrone must now refile his complaint in that case—without the cartoon dragon.
Perhaps time to find a serious lawyer. Although, I suspect that's like changing horses in the middle of a stream.
 
Upvote
30 (31 / -1)

Steel_Sloth

Smack-Fu Master, in training
56
Subscriptor
Dragonriders of ... McKern?

1746129654347.jpeg
 
Upvote
65 (65 / 0)

jamesb2147

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,640
I think even more horrifying is



I'm sure eventually it get to be useful, but AFAIK it's mostly more trouble than it's worth to lawyers because you have to go through and check every single link and citation/etc.
I can recall a CS conference I attended offering a talk on how AI was replacing many of the entry level legal roles, and this was 10+ years ago.

It's only the idiots using ChatGPT that are getting snowed.
 
Upvote
54 (56 / -2)
Chin up Jake, in many parts of the world, court, cosplay (with powdered wigs) remains an essential part of the dignity of the court.
If you're talking about England & Wales then wigs have been optional for a while, but are still often worn — especially by barristers keen to differentiate themselves from those pesky solicitor advocates.

Source: that time I went to law school and qualified as a barrister.
 
Upvote
131 (131 / 0)

Fred Duck

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,266
Judge Slays Dragon-Branded Lawyer’s Marketing Effort
Magistrate judge is breathing fire over law firm's dragon logo on legal pleadings
Exit the Dragon
US judge gives fiery response to e-filing “dominated by large cartoon dragon dressed in a suit”
These headliners can open for me any time!

Nate Anderson said:
His website, which also features the purple dragon and a bunch of busted links in the footer, says that the firm "integrates AI to lower the cost of legal services."
So that the case doesn't DRAG ON, am I right?

Nate Anderson said:
The New York Times got in touch with Perrone this week, who explained that he liked Game of Thrones, that he bought the dragon image online, and that he selected it because "people like dragons."
If Federal Magistrate Judge Ray Kent doesn't like the dragon, then logically...Oh dear. Don't say that.

Anyway, I imagine my watermark of a trouserless non-aubergine duck should pass the mustard.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
44 (46 / -2)

Wheels Of Confusion

Ars Legatus Legionis
75,620
Subscriptor
Now that I've gotten the obligatory pop culture reference out of my system.
Jacob A. Perrone is the lawyer behind Dragon Lawyers (phone number: [area code redacted] JAKELAW). His website, which also features the purple dragon and a bunch of busted links in the footer, says that the firm "integrates AI to lower the cost of legal services."
Oh no.

The whole story would be far more humorous were it not from a case in which Perrone represented a woman who claims that she nearly died after being incarcerated and not given proper medical care. Perrone must now refile his complaint in that case—without the cartoon dragon.
Can a competent lawfirm please step in to offer their services pro bono? This woman has been through enough. I'm not even joking.
 
Upvote
116 (117 / -1)

Don Reba

Ars Praefectus
3,323
Subscriptor++
Very good. I wish Nate had asked Beth come up with a better headline for this article.
 
Upvote
27 (29 / -2)

kimbykip

Smack-Fu Master, in training
36
How fiendish of DRAKELAW to try and worm such prideful displays of puffery into the solemn cavernous temples of our justice system! These polluted courts deal with enough smaug as it is, and many consider these judges our last bulwark against the destructive Leviathan (we've got some real slithery lizards up in here, who've got me qwyverin'). I applaud the magisterial clerk for casting out this brazen attempt to tip the scales of justice, as I think we can all agree this kind of nonsense makes legal proceedings dragon and on...
 
Upvote
26 (32 / -6)

adespoton

Ars Legatus Legionis
10,722
If you're talking about England & Wales then wigs have been optional for a while, but are still often worn — especially by barristers keen to differentiate themselves from those pesky solicitor advocates.

Source: that time I went to law school and qualified as a barrister.
But in Wales, they have pictures of a red dragon right there in the courtroom!
 
Upvote
75 (75 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…