But will it work?
The last few Intel CPUs had critical flaws and Intel didn't offer any true recall or compensation, choosing instead to more or less tell people, "Oh well."
They only responded after much goading from the media and large customers. They certainly were fine with "Oh well" until all heck broke loose in the tech media.Intel will replace any boxed 13th or 14th generation CPUs with a simple phone call. For prebuilt‘s every company that I’m aware of is replacing CPUs.
Free replacements plus a warranty extension to five years. The exact opposite of “oh well”.
Given how TDP has completely lost all meaning from both Intel and AMD, I think I will reserve judgement on this till reviews are out. It's clearly better than Raptor lake in terms of power consumption, but I'm not sure what else we can draw from this press release.Power draw has gone down from "crazy insane nutty nutbar" to just "bad." That's good if you must have intel at all costs, but 125 / 250 watt for even the Ultra 5 is not great compared to a 65 / 88 watt AMD 9700X.
I'll probably wait until next year to build my next gaming PC, after the nvidia 5070 and whatever the matching radeon are released. At that point I'll choose the CPU based on power efficiency and "good enough" performance since quiet is important to me.
NPUs appear to be more power efficient.Why would you need an NPU if you have a eGPU attached? That’s how AI is usually calculated, GPUs just are not energy efficient for mobile applications.
They also still have no tool for people to run to detect the level of damage to their CPU, and I've read horror stories of people getting the runaround trying to get their CPU exchanged.They only responded after much goading from the media and large customers. They certainly were fine with "Oh well" until all heck broke loose in the tech media.
I'm specifically talking about these desktop chips. That is what the article is about.There’s plenty of Lunar Lake reviews out there.
We're talking about Arrow Lake (desktop) not Lunar Lake (laptop). The TomsHardware first look is 100% intel claims and stats, they don't have their own CPUs to test yet.There’s plenty of Lunar Lake reviews out there.
I'm not confusing anything, I kept tabs on this right through from the first rumblings. Ars had minimal coverage, so unless one ventured to more tech focused sites much of the day by day happenings went unnoticed and there are STILL lots of unanswered questions. Now myself, and surely others that are affected by this are pleased with the end result, but for quite some time it certainly appeared like Intel was in full denial, more so when one considered their transparency when compared to AMD's when they had a similarly destructive bug. But hey, you just set it to Intel recommended defaults and everything will be fine, it's all the motherboard partners fault anyways.They responded when the problem was evident. Don’t confuse click hype with “goading”.
Does it make any sense to buy a CPU with built-in GPU if I already have an RTX 4080? Is there any scenario when this could become useful?
That Core Ultra 7 265KF looks like it could be a decent upgrade from my i7-6700K Skylake. I'll be buying a new gaming PC this winter and still have not decided whether to go with Intel or AMD.
When you’re building the computer you can leave out the GPU for simplicity sake at first.Does it make any sense to buy a CPU with built-in GPU if I already have an RTX 4080? Is there any scenario when this could become useful?
This was what I last knew. A lot of angry people with no refund from Intel. If they changed their minds later, it likely was after people moved on.They only responded after much goading from the media and large customers. They certainly were fine with "Oh well" until all heck broke loose in the tech media.
I mean, understatement? These new CPUs will be 4x to 10x faster, maybe more depending on workload.a decent upgrade from my i7-6700K
I think a lot of it was poor communication within the company after the refund process was conceived and rolled out. As of late it's more of a no questions asked process, which is good. The issue I and others had is the amount of hand wringing and mealy mouthed responses by Intel during this whole, needlessly drawn out affair. As for the topic of TFA I'm hoping this is the first release of a leaner, meaner Intel. Despite the flat performance improvement the efficiency gains will be most welcome.This was what I last knew. A lot of angry people with no refund from Intel. If they changed their minds later, it likely was after people moved on.
Yeah, on top of this... sure Intel took much, much longer than they should have to acknowledge the issue here. But I don't think they deserve less than praise for what is finally a fairly thorough/comprehensive response of replacing AND extending warranties on any affected chip.They responded when the problem was evident. Don’t confuse click hype with “goading”.
Intel will replace any boxed 13th or 14th generation CPUs with a simple phone call. For prebuilt‘s every company that I’m aware of is replacing CPUs.
Free replacements plus a warranty extension to five years. The exact opposite of “oh well”.
This is not true. I had to get 14900k replaced and it took a couple dozen emails over two months. I still haven't gotten my refund for the defective chip.Intel will replace any boxed 13th or 14th generation CPUs with a simple phone call. For prebuilt‘s every company that I’m aware of is replacing CPUs.
Free replacements plus a warranty extension to five years. The exact opposite of “oh well”.
Do you know who Wendell from Serve The Home is? Even he lays a chunk of the blame on the motherboard makers, and he‘s the one who really identified and quantified the problem.
View: https://youtu.be/vwHVGoY-Z68?si=DGZOMD0x1WFB7NAj
Not really. There's no real reason to use both.Does it make any sense to buy a CPU with built-in GPU if I already have an RTX 4080? Is there any scenario when this could become useful?
That Core Ultra 7 265KF looks like it could be a decent upgrade from my i7-6700K Skylake. I'll be buying a new gaming PC this winter and still have not decided whether to go with Intel or AMD.
After banging the drum on Thunderbolt 5 (USB4 v2.0) for over a year and claiming there would be products, Intel is still putting Thunderbolt 4 out… SMHThe chipsets will support up to two integrated Thunderbolt 4 ports—the first time these have been integrated directly into a desktop chipset rather than requiring a separate controller
Yep, apples to apples, in ten generations of CPUs over ten years, it's still not worth upgrading my Ivy Bridge setup. 1155 gang representMeh, my overclocked Sandy Bridge still works like a charm.
I'm using an i7-8700 from 2017 and my main reasons for upgrading are wanting better nvme and USB support, as well as figuring the motherboard won't last forever. Performance-wise it's still fine.Yep, apples to apples, in ten generations of CPUs over ten years, it's still not worth upgrading my Ivy Bridge setup. 1155 gang represent![]()
eSPI is effectively a layer on top of traditional SPI that Intel has been bringing up to replace the older LPC interface which was used to connect to various embedded controllers like fan controllers or legacy TPMs.What are the eSPI channels being used for? SPI is normally a very low level hardware interconnect; as an upgraded version I'd have assumed the same for eSPI. With it being called out alongside user facing features like PCIe and USB I'm wondering if they're doing more with it now though.
I just filed a ticket on the warranty site and they emailed me a UPS shipping label. I did not get a refund but I got a replacement and sold it for $500.This is not true. I had to get 14900k replaced and it took a couple dozen emails over two months. I still haven't gotten my refund for the defective chip.