Elon Musk’s 24-hour email ultimatum unfairly dismissed Twitter staff, court says.
See full article...
See full article...
...which might end with some people with a warrant removing some high value items from Twitter's European headquarters and/or impounding some Twitter property, or freeze their bank assets, or ask a judge to liquidate the company.Obvious next development: Twitter doesn't pay.
Twitter International UC does have the option of appealing the WRC ruling to the Labour Court.
And for the people that did click, I’m not sure that any new terms would be enforceable.Im guessing there are a ton of employees that now wish they had not caved and clicked yes.
To be fair, with $30bn wiped off its value since Musk arrived, money isn’t as available as it once was.
Check your decimals.$600,000 * 34 = $204,00,000 in potential payouts for Irish workers. That's a good start.
Fantastic.Twitter will not be able to appeal the WRC's decision, The Journal reported.
Then the court will confiscate assets to the amount of the judgement.Obvious next development: Twitter doesn't pay.
Your comma being misplaced made me do the math in my head a couple of times to make sure I wasn't insane.$600,000 * 34 = $204,00,000 in potential payouts for Irish workers. That's a good start.
Considering that he was saying he was going to fire 75% of the company at that time did anyone think this was supposed to be "let that sink in" instead of "throw everything out but the kitchen sink"?
Perhaps in the short term. It's not easy to retain top talent if you treat them like shit.Is just going to empower more of such activities. In the US especially, I can working for tech companies run by billionaire asshats becoming ever more dystopian.
Given they probably all weren't executives at that pay rate, NOT.$600,000 * 34 = $204,00,000 in potential payouts for Irish workers. That's a good start.
Rules are for losers. At this point it is clear Elon Musk just does what he wants. If he (or his companies) get sued then he will outspend the litigants and likely win. If he can't win he can drag it out. If he can't drag it out any longer he pays the equivalent of you paying $8 in fines and it goes away. Long before that happens this process has repeated a half dozen times so he has a never ending churn of lawsuits against him at all times. Unless someone can win a $30B lawsuit against it well it is rounding error.And I'm disappointed that Musk didn't have (or didn't bother to consult) internal counsel prior to making employment "Opt-In" at Twitter!
I wish, but I remember news articles about Twitter refusing to pay rent for its offices getting similar comments. I have not seen any follow-up news of Musk getting comeuppance.Then the court will confiscate assets to the amount of the judgement.
It's not okay in any country, but unfortunately most countries are just letting it slide. Especially the US, where corporations are people, but with more rights.“It is not okay for Mr. Musk, or indeed any large company to treat employees in such a manner in this country," Kenny said.
Thank you for this!From the article:
"X has not commented on the ruling but is likely disappointed by the loss."
(Emphasis mine.)
Please stop doing this. If X hasn't (or won't) comment, just leave it at that and don't make any assumptions of how they feel about it.
I'm guessing the court will go for whatever looks like it will get the $600k with the least effort on their part.Then the court will confiscate assets to the amount of the judgement.
In those cases, there were people saying that evicting Twitter would probably lead to the buildings sitting empty for a while. So the landlords had an incentive to give Twitter more time to pay up instead of starting the eviction process.I wish, but I remember news articles about Twitter refusing to pay rent for its offices getting similar comments. I have not seen any follow-up news of Musk getting comeuppance.
I'm sure Musk will respond in his usual calm, collected, and thoughtful manner, and not with an offensive emoji or crude edgelord meme.X has not commented on the ruling but is likely disappointed by the loss.
Agreed, if we're going to speculate without evidence here's mine:From the article:
"X has not commented on the ruling but is likely disappointed by the loss."
(Emphasis mine.)
Please stop doing this. If X hasn't (or won't) comment, just leave it at that and don't make any assumptions of how they feel about it.