Well the music publishers and rights holders can push Spotify they can't push Apple or Amazon or they will push back harder.I don't want podcasts in my music app. I don't want audiobooks in music app. I don't want TikTok in my music app. I definitely don't want to pay more to support all the stuff I don't want.
I'm also guessing it's safe to assume Spotify HiFi is never going to happen at this point.
Having been born and raised in the Vinyl Era, and having recorded the music I wanted onto cassette tapes for the car because radio drove me nuts with the commercials and full on sucked balls when driving across country, one would think something like Spotify would appeal to me.Prices will rise until consumers make alternative choices.
It's not a comparable situation at all. Spotify signed a $250 million deal for JRE (#1 US podcast). On the other hand, Spotify pays $0 for TAL (#4 US podcast) and other non-exclusives.Seems unreasonable to ask them to keep 2011 prices forever, which multiple people quoted in the article seem to be saying. I don't like it, but pretty much everything is up by these kind of margins, and these clowns have yet to manage a profitable year.
Insisting they should keep prices low by omitting content individuals aren't interested in is also an odd point. Is there reason to believe prices are higher because of podcasts were added? Seems like asking them to omit country music, to keep prices down for my hip-hop, which misses the point on how most services are better able to succeed with a variety of content and wider audience.
For every dollar Spotify makes in revenue 63 cents goes to the record labels.So a $2 price hike a month within a year? That's huge. So that's $24 a year extra for each subscriber. They gonna be making bank now, so now they can stop their bitching about not making a profit. Let's see if July 2025 brings another $1 increase.
They paid $250 million to Joe Rogan alone for a podcast.Seems unreasonable to ask them to keep 2011 prices forever, which multiple people quoted in the article seem to be saying. I don't like it, but pretty much everything is up by these kind of margins, and these clowns have yet to manage a profitable year.
Insisting they should keep prices low by omitting content individuals aren't interested in is also an odd point. Is there reason to believe prices are higher because of podcasts were added? Seems like asking them to omit country music, to keep prices down for my hip-hop, which misses the point on how most services are better able to succeed with a variety of content and wider audience.
No they won't.So a $2 price hike a month within a year? That's huge. So that's $24 a year extra for each subscriber. They gonna be making bank now, so now they can stop their bitching about not making a profit. Let's see if July 2025 brings another $1 increase.
The coronavirus rotted Rogan's brain, straight up. This guy will go on completely unprompted tirades about masks and vaccines and whatever else for 10 and 20 minutes at a time. While the guest is sitting there like "Can we please talk about something else?", but saying that means you never come back.Their biggest podcaster's stance that vaccines need a debate or aren't needed for "healthy" people or whatever he's yammering about at the moment tells me all I need to know about what price Spotify is worth.
(spoiler: it's not worth it)
I think most are aware of that.I'd like to point out for the price of a subscription you can buy one album per month, every month. You then own that music "forever" (for as long as you can store it, or the download resource still exists). You can play it back from your own device, or run a NextCloud container and stream it to yourself.
I am gutting my old iPod to put in 1TB of storage and a chonker ass battery this weekend. Parts are on my desk right now.
When I bought a few songs from Amazon I noticed they were also added to a playlist available in the streaming service. I believe the same is of Apple Music (and maybe Qobuz).I think most are aware of that.
The issue is new music discovery for me. And the problem is that I would require purchased music and streamed discovered music to be on the same service so I can manage playlists. Not sure where I can get this...
Completely agree. I only use it for music and somehow Spotify keeps getting worse. The navigation is difficult now with so many menus. Half the songs in my curated playlists are no longer playable and show up greyed out, or magically disappear from my saved music folder. Don't even get me started on the fact that you literally cannot see a list of songs by an artist anywhere in the app. WTF.Spotify was, for a long time, my go-to. Their recommendations were pretty good. Not great, but good. Before that, and I remain pissed at Microsoft for not spinning this out rather than killing it: Zune. The Zune player was (and maybe is) the best-looking media player, and certainly better than iTunes (at the time). Wish they had though of the name "Groove" (Windows 7/8/10 app, I think) earlier. That subscription, the same price as Spotify, gave you tons of streaming and let you designate up to 10 songs per month as "bought". Meaning you could stream an album a lot and then "buy" some of them as permanently yours, even after your subscription ended.
But I stopped using Spotify as it got less focused and a worse deal. Apple Music now costs $6 a month for students, $12 a month for personal, and $17 for family. Pandora, which remains the best recommendation engine for me, costs $11 personal and $18 a month for family. Apple One, which includes Music, TV, Arcade, and online storage is $20 personal and $26 family. Which means, for a family plan, Spotify is now more expensive than Apple and Pandora. And it means that for family, an extra $6 gets you all the premium Apple TV content AND Arcade, which remains...meh, but does offer ad-free versions of good travel games. Spotify isn't a great deal anymore.
If it went back to being a better deal that those that it's competing against, if it spun out podcasts as a separate subscription, I'd give it a go again. If it copied Zune and let you "buy" an album a month as part of the subscription? I'd go back right away.
But the value isn't there for me. So I migrated my stuff out. And without change, I'm not going back. I don't care about Joe Rogan.
I kind of agree, but am not a fan of articles going "hey look at what this random person said" as a lazy proxy for sentiment analysis. (I also hate the frequent politician xyz says blah without a remote effort to fact check). So plus for not using twitter, but I would prefer something broader unless the random quote is meaningful.Slightly offtopic, but I just wanted to say I appreciated the quotes from users being sourced from various forums, rather than embedding the most popular tweets (which I can pretty much guarantee is what would have happened 2 years ago).
I wasn't aware that a $400 minicomputer and open-source software offered me legal access to over 100 million songs. Clearly I've been out of the loop.Spotify: Still offering nothing that you can't build yourself with a $400 minicomputer and open-source software.
It's crazy to me that so many on what was formerly a site for techies pay monthly for things that are trivial to build. At least running your own personal video site takes a lot of storage. The same is not at all true for music. (And if you need a service to help you discover new music, it's time to reevaluate your peer network.)
How so? If they were spending money on artists, sure, but instead they’re spending it on spreading alt-right fascism instead.
I have every right to be angry that they’re going to start charging more to support people who want to destroy the world.
I cancelled a number of years ago, but hilariously my 2020 spotify wrapped was just:Sure, some people are more of a "I never listen to the same track twice" user that might benefit from rental model. But I'm confident there's a chunk of users who are paying Spotify every month for the privilege of listening to the same couple albums.
I used them right after their awkward "every single station eventually leads to some obscure indie band who doesn't demand high royalties" phase, and they were alright. The main trick to using the free version was to pick either Grateful Dead or other prog rock stuff so you could game their "3 songs per ad" system by getting the 15+ minute live versions.Sometimes I think I’m the only one who listens to Pandora.
i’m guessing you are out of the loop because you have not re-evaluated your peer network recently.I wasn't aware that a $400 minicomputer and open-source software offered me legal access to over 100 million songs. Clearly I've been out of the loop.
I just use adblock on pc and a spotify mod on my phone, I never paid one single cent to spotify.
So you want the library of Spotify but with none of the parts that subsidize it (the audiobooks/podcasts are bigger profit centers than the music).I'm not going to willingly give money to Google or Apple. Tidal's library is laughable. Pandora's randomization and auto-playlisting/suggestion engine has been terrible for years.
My switching costs are low - I don't make playlists, I think it's weird that people use Spotify's "Social" aspects, and I have no interest in podcasts or audiobooks. Seems a bit ridiculous that there doesn't seem to be an alternative music streaming service for the no-frills user.