Musk: Twitter will consult civil rights groups before restoring any banned users.
Read the whole story
Read the whole story
I guess the American Nazi Party is a civil rights group now.
Banned means banned.
But I'm sure Musko will figure out profitable "unban" fee.
Problem is, he's already intervened. Mark Finchem, a candidate for AZ Sec of State, had his ban overturned this week.
"Pay to say", coming soon to Twitter!Banned means banned.
But I'm sure Musko will figure out profitable "unban" fee.
And $4.99/month subscription fee to maintain unbanned status. Unbanned Platinum will run $8.99/month.
"Pay to say", coming soon to Twitter!Banned means banned.
But I'm sure Musko will figure out profitable "unban" fee.
And $4.99/month subscription fee to maintain unbanned status. Unbanned Platinum will run $8.99/month.
Banned means banned.
But I'm sure Musko will figure out profitable "unban" fee.
WHAT IF- The accusation that someone is MAGA, an “election denier,” a “climate denier,” a “data denier,” etc., is just a deceptive way for the CENSOR to be a “free speech denier,”-
that is, of denying one’s political opponent the right to express their opinion?
WHAT IF all of these sophists just like to silence dissent, like Sophocles being condemned to drink hemlock-poison, because HE was 'dangerous', a 'denier', who prodded people to ask questions?
Does anybody remember the ACLU of Skokie, which actually fought for free-speech, no matter WHO disliked what people said?
"In 1978, the ACLU took a controversial stand for free speech by defending a neo-Nazi group that wanted to march through the Chicago suburb of Skokie..."
www. aclu. org/ other/ aclu-history-taking-stand-free-speech-skokie
WHAT IF- The accusation that someone is MAGA, an “election denier,” a “climate denier,” a “data denier,” etc., is just a deceptive way for the CENSOR to be a “free speech denier,”-
that is, of denying one’s political opponent the right to express their opinion?
WHAT IF all of these sophists just like to silence dissent, like Sophocles being condemned to drink hemlock-poison, because HE was 'dangerous', a 'denier', who prodded people to ask questions?
Does anybody remember the ACLU of Skokie, which actually fought for free-speech, no matter WHO disliked what people said?
"In 1978, the ACLU took a controversial stand for free speech by defending a neo-Nazi group that wanted to march through the Chicago suburb of Skokie..."
www. aclu. org/ other/ aclu-history-taking-stand-free-speech-skokie
WHAT IF- The accusation that someone is MAGA, an “election denier,” a “climate denier,” a “data denier,” etc., is just a deceptive way for the CENSOR to be a “free speech denier,”-
that is, of denying one’s political opponent the right to express their opinion?
WHAT IF all of these sophists just like to silence dissent, like Sophocles being condemned to drink hemlock-poison, because HE was 'dangerous', a 'denier', who prodded people to ask questions?
Does anybody remember the ACLU of Skokie, which actually fought for free-speech, no matter WHO disliked what people said?
"In 1978, the ACLU took a controversial stand for free speech by defending a neo-Nazi group that wanted to march through the Chicago suburb of Skokie..."
www. aclu. org/ other/ aclu-history-taking-stand-free-speech-skokie
I mean... Something Awful already figured out how to monetize unbanning people, so he's 20 years late to the game.Banned means banned.
But I'm sure Musko will figure out profitable "unban" fee.
Yes, let's just unban a man who supported something so racist that even Quillette called him out on it or thinks that LGBTQ educators are "groomers".I want James Lindsay unbanned. His case is a litmus test of previous Twitter's insanity.
Shitposting on Twitter is a well-known civil liberty. I hear the UN might even elevate it to their declared list of human rights.Looks like the freeze peach assholeflutists are here to lecture us about Skokie again.
WHAT IF- The accusation that someone is MAGA, an “election denier,” a “climate denier,” a “data denier,” etc., is just a deceptive way for the CENSOR to be a “free speech denier,”-
that is, of denying one’s political opponent the right to express their opinion?
WHAT IF all of these sophists just like to silence dissent, like Sophocles being condemned to drink hemlock-poison, because HE was 'dangerous', a 'denier', who prodded people to ask questions?
Does anybody remember the ACLU of Skokie, which actually fought for free-speech, no matter WHO disliked what people said?
"In 1978, the ACLU took a controversial stand for free speech by defending a neo-Nazi group that wanted to march through the Chicago suburb of Skokie..."
www. aclu. org/ other/ aclu-history-taking-stand-free-speech-skokie
I think you mean the philosopher, Socrates -- not the tragedian.
I do have a bunch of election deniers in my own neighborhood & it is their right to believe whatever they like.g)