Love them, hate them, or profit off them immensely, one thing is certainly true about employees: they’ll inevitably try to bring their own tech onto the corporate network. Our report last week about Forrester Research’s latest IT survey caused major controversy by suggesting that IT departments are less tolerant of employee-owned Macs than Windows PCs. We are going to revisit those numbers briefly, report back further information we’ve received from Forrester, and then we’re going to ask you how you’d account for this phenomenon. Is Apple to blame? Should IT shops wake up?
The survey data
To review: A Q3 2011 Forrester survey of 1,053 companies in North America and Europe with at least 20 employees found that 32 percent do not allow employee-owned Windows PCs access to any corporate resources—whether it be corporate applications, the internal network, or even just Web-based e-mail. In the same group of 1,053 companies, 42 percent block Macs. If you do the math, the group blocking Mac computers is 31 percent larger than the group blocking Windows.
Is this difference statistically significant? Yes, it is. The number of people surveyed is consistent between the two results (Forrester provided us with a set of numbers from a different population survey on Friday, although the data is essentially the same), and the questions were the same.
If you’re not yet convinced, a suitable test for this data set is Fisher’s Exact Test. The null hypothesis is that platform choice makes no difference to the granting of access. Our alternative hypothesis is that platform choice has some influence over the granting of access. The 2-tailed p-value from Fisher’s Exact Test is 0.00165. With a typical alpha (significance level) of 5 percent, or even 1 percent, we would therefore reject the null hypothesis, and accept the alternative hypothesis. That is, the granting of access isn’t independent of platform.

Loading comments...