Biz & IT

Charter to buy Time Warner Cable, become second biggest broadband provider

Where Comcast failed, Charter will try to convince FCC to approve merger.

Jon Brodkin – May 26, 2015 9:48 am | 119

Charter's footprint after the proposed merger. Credit: Charter

Charter Communications has struck a deal to buy its larger rival Time Warner Cable (TWC) for $56.7 billion, a partnership that would make it the nation’s second largest broadband provider after Comcast, the companies announced today. Charter also announced a related $10.4 billion deal to buy Bright House Networks, a smaller cable company.

The merged company would leapfrog AT&T into second place with 19.4 million Internet subscribers. Comcast has 22.4 million while AT&T has 16.1 million. The post-merger Charter would have 17.3 million pay-TV customers, behind Comcast and DirecTV, as well as 9.4 million phone customers. Overall, Charter would serve 23.9 million customers in 41 states after the proposed merger.

Charter today is the fourth biggest cable company after Comcast, Time Warner Cable, and Cox.

Comcast apparently supports Charter’s purchase of TWC. “This deal makes all the sense in the world. I would like to congratulate all the parties,” Comcast CEO Brian Roberts said in a statement sent to news organizations.

But while a bigger Charter would rival Comcast in terms of broadband and TV subscribers, it will argue that it would not pose the same competitive dangers as the failed Comcast/Time Warner Cable merger. The Federal Communications Commission and Justice Department prevented Comcast from buying TWC, saying the increased subscriber base combined with its ownership of NBC and other programmers would increase its incentive to discriminate against online video services that rely on its broadband network.

While TWC owns some regional sports networks, Charter pointed out in a presentation that “Charter owns no programming interests.”

“I’m confident our proposed transaction will obtain approval from regulators,” Charter CEO Tom Rutledge said in a conference call with investors, according to Katy on the Hill. “This is a very different transaction.” Compared to Comcast/TWC, the proposed Charter/TWC merger is “significantly smaller without any vertical integration concerns,” added TWC CEO Rob Marcus.

By gaining size, Charter would have greater negotiating power over programming networks that need to strike carriage deals to reach Charter’s cable TV customers.

“An absence of harm is not sufficient”

But that doesn’t mean it’s a slam dunk. The companies have to prove to the FCC that the merger will benefit consumers, not just that it won’t harm them. FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler issued a statement today saying that, “The FCC reviews every merger on its merits and determines whether it would be in the public interest. In applying the public interest test, an absence of harm is not sufficient. The Commission will look to see how American consumers would benefit if the deal were to be approved.”

Charter said it will “deliver superior customer care” and bring faster speeds to TWC subscribers.

“Charter’s slowest speed tier (60Mbps downstream) is considerably faster and less expensive than TWC’s comparable tiers, with no data caps or usage based pricing,” Charter’s presentation said. “Charter will bring these products and pricing to TWC and BHN [Bright House Networks] customers, while embracing TWC’s and BHN’s rollouts of a 300Mbps tier.”

(Bright House is owned by the Advance/Newhouse Partnership, which is part of Advance Publications. Advance Publications owns Condé Nast, which owns Ars Technica. Advance/Newhouse would own 13 percent of Charter after the transactions announced today.)While Comcast has been involved in high-profile interconnection disputes that harmed the quality of Netflix and other Internet services, Charter said it “will continue to invest in interconnection to minimize likelihood of congestion.”

Charter also said it will follow basic net neutrality principles even if the cable industry is able to overturn the FCC’s recent decision to reclassify broadband as a common carrier service. “Regardless of Title II litigation, we have no plans to block, throttle or engage in paid prioritization because our customers demand an open Internet,” Charter said.

Charter said its bigger size will allow it to “increase facilities-based broadband competition. But that doesn’t mean Charter will build wireline networks in residential territory controlled by Comcast or other cable companies. Instead, Charter would plan “wider deployment of new competitive facilities based Wi-Fi networks in public places, and the footprint expansion of optical networks to serve the large marketplace of small and medium sized businesses.”

Just as Comcast said its Time Warner Cable buy would not reduce competition in any residential market, Charter said its own “transaction does not reduce any competition in any market.”

“New Charter will have the largest cable presence in only 5 of the top 20 DMAs [designated market areas],” Charter said. “The transaction does not change this metric, as TWC and BHN are already affiliated, and Charter isn’t the largest operator in any of the top 20 DMAs.”

Charter said it expects to get regulatory approval and close the TWC and Bright House deals by the end of 2015.

Charter also tried to buy TWC at the beginning of 2014, but was rebuffed, and TWC settled on the Comcast deal instead.

If the Charter/TWC/Bright House deal is approved, investor Liberty Broadband would own about 19 percent of the merged company. Liberty, chaired by longtime cable industry executive John Malone, already owns a portion of both Charter and TWC and would invest another $5 billion in the deal.

TWC shareholders would own about 44 percent of the post-merger Charter. The rest would be owned by Charter shareholders and Advance/Newhouse.

Listing image: Charter

Jon Brodkin Senior IT Reporter

Jon is a Senior IT Reporter for Ars Technica. He covers the telecom industry, Federal Communications Commission rulemakings, broadband consumer affairs, court cases, and government regulation of the tech industry.

119 Comments